>>I saw no hint in the original link that suggested any implication of bombing.
>Neither did I, and I would be interested in an explanation of why this was even brought up.

I guess that explanation would have to come from you, J, as you seem to have introduced it way back up top

Good God. I never said, or thought, that the link said anything about bombing. The term 'ground zero' is used for where a bomb hits. The term brought up bombing. The link did not, as far as I know. I felt like that statement was made to imply that I had used the link as a vehicle for promoting my argument, when in fact that was not the case.