|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Why do we ask if a person is "comfortable", rather than "comforted"? Seems to me that once a person is cozy enough to find themself in a state of comfort, they should not be described as "comfortable", as that implies a *potential for comfort and takes no note of the fact that the comforting has already been accomplished.
are there other -able words that fall into this category?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858 |
Arguable if they fit:equable,curable,durable,habitable,manageable,passable... As you say, the "able" part looks to the future. In "comfortable" it does not seem to look to the future.
Hey, I just remembered "Miserable". The "able" here does not look to future!
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
good one, dr bill! miserable appears to be quite similar. i suppose we should by rights call ourselves miseried when in such a state, rather than miserable. then again, perhaps it's a nod to the old "things could be worse" axiom.
how intriguing that each of these words describes an emotional or physical state... does two make a pattern? are there more?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542 |
>each of these words describes an emotional or physical state
well, there are two meanings usually given for -able/-ible; one relates to a specific action, the other to a specified state. there are other state-ables, such as valuable, horrible.... but it must be said that these soon overlap with actions: honorable, dependable, delectable.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296 |
Actions: unalienable, malleable, illegible, indecipherable, and inscrutable
Constant state (inexorable, unreliable, and deplorable) = gullible. Also, able is a state.
(How does table fit into this mix? And cable? And ladle? A ladle lades out something, I suppose... But a table doesn't tabe anything... And a cable doesn't cabe anything? My mind's now quite addled, but that's another suffix.)
Intolerably disabled, DubDub
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 315
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 315 |
Often in this Board I have the feeling that there are discussions based upon the fact that English speakers barely 'feel' latin roots in their words. Here, to me ALL able -words and ible -words are similar, and expressing the "possibility of being something" . I mean, honorable= which can be honored... and so on.. horrible, also, I feel that probably there is a latin verb similar to "to horror"= to look at with horror so that horrible to me is something you can look at with horror..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296 |
Whitty wrote: Formidable question. ...
...yet not unfathomable
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296 |
And the crucible...
What test would there be for deciding between "ible" and "able" when stumped about a spelling? Is there some fine point of distinction between the two suffixes?
WW
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,809
Members9,187
|
Most Online3,341 Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
0 members (),
832
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|