Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith.org Forums General Topics Information and announcements The stales' Readability Index
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
OP I am determined to maximise my daily AWAD experience whilst minimising the amount of my Post Edit: working day doing so. As we all know, the board can be slow and addictive and I'll bet most of us aren't the world's greatest typists. All of these add to the time we spend on line.
I've noted a recurring relationship between the 'View' and 'Reply' frequencies of each post in all of the forums that has helped me optimise my daily exposure.....
It seems that if the 'Replies' are more than 10% of the 'Views' then there's a good chance that the topic has wide appeal and has attracted replies not only from a good many people, but also a diversity of posters (not just one or two going back and forth - though this does happen). As a bit of a generalist, I find that these posts are the ones that I tend to be most interested in and contribute to.
On the other hand, where the number of replies is significantly less than 10%, the subject matter often requires specialist knowledge - in linguistics, literature, science etc (and cooking). It seems that many members avoid replying to these posts but are still happy to view what their learned colleagues have to say on the matter - perhaps being of a mindset that all information is good information.
Anyway, for those of us that shouldn't spend all their work time on the AWAD board, this may be a handy tip. Rather than ignore them completely, you could save the less-than-ten-percenters for a liesurely browse when you get home.
stales
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted ![]()
The stales' Readability Index
stales 11/27/01 11:59 PM ![]()
Re: The stales' Readability Index
Jackie 11/28/01 12:47 AM ![]()
Re: The stales' Readability Index
Wordwind 11/28/01 12:49 AM ![]()
Re: The stales' Readability Index
AnnaStrophic 11/28/01 01:21 AM ![]()
![]()
Max Quordlepleen 11/28/01 07:09 AM ![]()
Re: The stales' Readability Index
stales 11/28/01 05:18 AM ![]()
Re: The stales' Readability Index
wwh 11/28/01 04:17 PM ![]()
Re: The stales' Readability Index
Faldage 11/28/01 04:36 PM ![]()
Re: The stales' Readability Index
Wordwind 11/28/01 11:34 PM ![]()
Re: The stales' Readability Index
Keiva 11/29/01 02:07 PM ![]()
Faldage addendum to the stales' Readability Index
Faldage 11/28/01 02:40 PM ![]()
Re: and another thing...
Anonymous 11/28/01 04:11 PM ![]()
Re: Faldage addendum (I just noticed)
Faldage 11/28/01 04:20 PM ![]()
Re: The stales' Readability Index
tsuwm 11/28/01 04:43 PM ![]()
Re: The stales' Readability Index
Capital Kiwi 11/28/01 08:28 PM ![]()
![]()
Max Quordlepleen 11/28/01 08:35 PM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics Forums16Topics13,915Posts229,850Members9,197 Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members Bill_L, achz, MAGNVSTALSMA, Burlyfish, Renegade98
9,197 Registered Users
Who's Online Now 0 members (), 626 guests, and 2 robots. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days) A C Bowden 20Bill_L 1
Top Posters wwh 13,858Faldage 13,803Jackie 11,613wofahulicodoc 10,877tsuwm 10,542LukeJavan8 9,944Buffalo Shrdlu 7,210AnnaStrophic 6,511Wordwind 6,296of troy 5,400
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith.org