Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#4679 07/29/00 05:05 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
tsuwm Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
one of the things that I find fascinating about language is the way it can become twisted with self reference and paradox. Douglas Hofstadter dwells on this extensively in his writing. Here are some of his examples (which remind me in a twisted way of some of our ongoing discussions):

- This line from Shakespeare has delusions of grandeur.
- If writers were bakers, this sentence would be exactly a dozen words long.
- I don't care who wrote this sentence -- whoever he is he's a damn sexist!
-What would life be, without me?

here are some that involve translation issues:

-Would not be anomalous if were in Italian.
-When one this sentence into the German to translate wanted, would one the fact exploit, that the word order and the punctuation already with the German conventions agree.

and finally, "Hofstadter's Law" states: "It always takes longer than you think it will take, even if you take into account Hofstadter's Law."





#4680 07/30/00 02:48 AM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 37
S
newbie
Offline
newbie
S
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 37
Depressing this sentence's subject, plunged her into a fugue.


#4681 07/30/00 03:15 AM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 37
S
newbie
Offline
newbie
S
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 37
"Front to back", Crab said canonically!

To take it even further:

Canon said crabbily "front to back"; Crab said canonically "back to front".

(so sorry, I just can't help myself)

This post obversely needs help.


#4682 07/30/00 05:53 AM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 37
S
newbie
Offline
newbie
S
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 37
By describing the massive man, she increased the sentence's subject.

By saying nothing she decreased the subject's sentence.

These are so many different variations of different kinds of self-references, aren't there?

I really should be studying. I have an exam Tuesday, and the temptation to play with words far exceeds the temptation to to study. hmmmmmmmm.


#4683 04/10/02 10:49 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526


You can tell DH is a fan of lisp.

Did you notice the self-reference in the bibliography of GEB? I didn't notice until an acquaintance pointed it out to me.

(I recently read Neal Stephenson's Cryptonomicon. He has a phoney character in there with the initials GEB, which I assume is a barb at DH.)


k



#4684 04/10/02 02:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526

#4685 04/10/02 03:27 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Wow, very appropriate, FF! I wasn't at all sure I could see these hidden pictures on my monitor--it is very difficult for me even when they're on paper; I can't even always see them. These things are just magical, to me--there's nothing there--but there IS!

For those who don't know, the trick to seeing these is to let your eyes unfocus a little, and keep them from re-focusing normally. I can get them unfocused by leaning forward till the surface picture blurs--my problem comes in preventing them from refocusing as I slowly lean back. And even when I can, it takes some time for me to be able to see the hidden shapes, but when I do...WOW!


#4686 04/10/02 04:20 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Re:They're stereograms.

Okay, back to words-- i have heard them called
RAS-- Random dot Astiogram S, pronounced, RAZZ(as in razz a ma tazz) -- why astiogram's? i dunno. don't remember all the detail of them either.

Steve Pinker has an nice explaination of how and why they work in How the Mind Words, someplace about page 340, (give or take 20 pages or so)if you want some details, thats one place to look.--opps, i slipped there-- but it was an interesting, and challenging concept to understand, and i reread it several times, and still only have a vague understanding.


#4687 04/10/02 04:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526

That's one of my favorite books.

It's got one of my all time funniest sorta-stories innit. It's the "meat can think?" bit he claimed to have gotten off the Internet. Funny, funny story.

There are some math and programming sites on the web that go into some detail on the stereograms. There's also some free software you can download to make them - which I plan to try some day.

k



#4688 04/10/02 05:15 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
tsuwm Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
here is the one and only google hit on "meat can think", is it this to which Pinker referred?

http://pages.infinit.net/philoex/dennett.html

()

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,580
Members9,187
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Karin, JeffMackwood, artguitar, Jim_W, Rdbuffalo
9,187 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 332 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,713
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,931
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5