the question would be (and the point I guess I didn't make very well): is there a difference between a polymath (a person of much or varied learning) and a pantomath? if you want to make the argument that a pantomath is a person of much AND varied learning, I will gladly see that you get an appointment to the Tetrapyloctomy
Society. it's an unnecessary word, best reserved for applying to someone who *thinks they know everything.

-joe (pantomath is my middle name) friday