Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#45065 10/19/01 05:56 AM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
B
Bingley Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Somebody used the word "cognates" recently to mean members of a family of words (such as expect, expectant, expectation). I always understood cognates as being descendants in different languages from a common etymon, such as English mother and Latin mater.

So, is there a technical term to cover the members of a group of related words such as relative, relation, relationship, relate, etc?

Bingley


Bingley
#45066 10/19/01 08:04 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 393
N
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
N
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 393
Your usage is the same as mine. I can't think of a simple technical term for closely related words within the one language. (Doesn't mean there isn't one, just means I'm getting old and drink too much.) Of course they are trivially cognate, but I wouldn't use the word 'cognate' that way.


#45067 10/19/01 10:41 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
M
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
M
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
But doesn't descent from a common root also cover the idea of a family of words like this?

cog·nate (kŏg'nât')
adj.
Related by blood; having a common ancestor.
Related in origin, as certain words in genetically related languages descended from the same ancestral root; for example, English name and Latin nômen from Indo-European *no-men-.
Related or analogous in nature, character, or function.
n.
One related by blood or origin with another, especially a person sharing an ancestor with another.
A word related to one in another language.
[Latin cognâtus : co-, co- + gnâtus, born, past participle of nâscî, to be born.]

cog·na'tion n.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.


#45068 10/19/01 12:25 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
and i would expect cognates to be just as the person who was speaking to you did.. a family of words descend, descendant, descendancy, and so on. I am sure i would understand the word being used as you define it.. but that wouldn't be my first thought, or even my second.

the only other way i would think of cognates, would be a verb, especially an irregular verb.. i am, you are, he is, i was, they were...

(I went scurrying to the dictionary as i read your post.. and thought--Have i misunderstood this word for years? and while M-W 10th supports my usage, your meaning is listed as 3 a, and mine as 3 b and 3 c....)


#45069 10/19/01 03:46 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
J
old hand
Offline
old hand
J
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
the only other way i would think of cognates, would be a verb, especially an irregular verb.. i am, you are, he is, i was, they were...

Isn't that conjugates? As in verb conjugation or conjugal visit?


#45070 10/19/01 04:05 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
fwiw, OED2:

1. Descended from a common ancestor; of the same stock or family.
1827 G. Higgins Celtic Druids 78 Some of their cognate tribes. 1864 Kirk Chas. Bold II. iv. ii. 251 The barriers between cognate states. 1880 Muirhead tr. Instit. Gaius i. §156 Agnates are+persons who are of kin through males,—cognate, as it were, through the father.

2. Of languages: Descended from the same original language; of the same linguistic family. Of words: Coming naturally from the same root, or representing the same original word, with differences due to subsequent separate phonetic development; thus, Eng. five, L. quinque, Gr. pŚmse, are cognate words, representing a primitive *pénke.



#45071 10/19/01 04:07 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 393
N
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
N
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 393
The parts of "to be" are not all cognates, even in the looser sense. "am", "are", "is" come from one root, es-, and the past tense w- words from another, and "be" is a third distinct root.



Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,413
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (wofahulicodoc), 998 guests, and 6 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,584
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,922
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5