Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith.org Forums General Topics Q&A about words Weaponisation
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Saw a biochemist being quizzed on this subject on TV today. What constituted "weaponised" anthrax vs. normal anthrax came up in the interview. Thought you may be interested to hear the following...
Apparently anybody with a sample of the virus can grow anthrax and produce spores. Problem is, the spores produced in this manner clump together and are thus relatively heavy. They are no good for weapons because they lodge in the upper respiratory tract. (Sounds bad enough to me).
In order to get right into the lungs, the clumps of spores need to broken up by further processing. This is the "weaponisation" phase we've heard about.
So now you know. Blame the biochemists!
stales
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics Forums16Topics13,915Posts229,920Members9,197 Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members Bill_L, achz, MAGNVSTALSMA, Burlyfish, Renegade98
9,197 Registered Users
Who's Online Now 0 members (), 803 guests, and 11 robots. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days) A C Bowden 26
Top Posters wwh 13,858Faldage 13,803Jackie 11,613wofahulicodoc 10,911tsuwm 10,542LukeJavan8 9,948Buffalo Shrdlu 7,210AnnaStrophic 6,511Wordwind 6,296of troy 5,400
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith.org