Even an anarcho-syndicalist collective needs a spokesman every once in a while.

Well, geez, thanks Fald-er-iago! But wouldn't be impossible for them to select one? That would imply that the syndics would trust someone to be the spokesman and that the anarchists could agree on anything, like whether they needed a spokesman at all, and what the position s/he supported would be! I'm s-o-o-o-o confused!

BTW, I do rather like your proliferation of my misspelling of Genghiz Khan's name. But then, I guess they simply knocked off anyone who misspelled it back then! Is your head feeling secure on your shoulders, hmmm?


The idiot also known as Capfka ...