Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith Talk Forums General Topics Q&A about words Does + Does: Is there a -nym for it?
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
If one goes by etymology alone, then the terms could be more inclusive, as Brandon suggests, but then you would lose two perfectly good and much needed terms and not have anything to replace them with. I suppose you could call them heterophones and heterographs if you wanted but they would be open to over-inclusiveness as well.
Bingley
Bingley
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted ![]()
Does + Does: Is there a -nym for it?
WhitmanO'Neill 06/29/2001 10:14 PM ![]()
Re: Does + Does: Is there a -nym for it?
Anonymous 06/29/2001 10:56 PM ![]()
Re: Does + Does: Is there a -nym for it?
WhitmanO'Neill 06/29/2001 11:28 PM ![]()
Re: Does + Does: Is there a -nym for it?
Rusty 07/01/2001 2:11 AM ![]()
Re: Does + Does: Is there a -nym for it?
tsuwm 06/30/2001 2:31 AM ![]()
Re: New -Nyms?
WhitmanO'Neill 06/30/2001 11:52 AM ![]()
Re: New -Nyms?
Jackie 06/30/2001 12:25 PM ![]()
Re: Wide-nym
wow 06/30/2001 2:34 PM ![]()
Re: New --Nyms (cont'd)
WhitmanO'Neill 06/30/2001 10:59 PM ![]()
Re: Does + Does: Is there a -nym for it?
Bingley 07/02/2001 3:40 AM ![]()
Re: Does + Does: Is there a -nym for it?
Brandon 07/02/2001 12:11 PM ![]()
Re: Does + Does: Is there a -nym for it?
Bingley 07/03/2001 4:19 AM ![]()
Re: Does + Does: Is there a -nym for it?
Alex Williams 07/03/2001 11:38 PM ![]()
Re: Does + Does: Is there a -nym for it?
Anonymous 07/04/2001 12:40 AM ![]()
Re: Does + Does: Is there a -nym for it?
nancyk 07/05/2001 12:30 AM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith Talk