|
|
#33532
06/25/2001 3:27 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 609
addict
|
|
addict
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 609 |
wwh - the explanations given at your link are the ones often proposed. I ceratinly have nothing to judge them by. It talks about the phrase only being in general usage from the 1980s. I am not aware of it being in widespread use until after the recent film, but my memory tells me I had heard and understood the term back in the mid-60s. Rod
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Full Monty
|
wwh
|
06/25/2001 2:47 PM
|
Re: Full Monty
|
rodward
|
06/25/2001 3:27 PM
|
Re: No, no, no, no, no!
|
Faldage
|
06/25/2001 3:36 PM
|
Re: No, no, no, no, no!
|
wwh
|
06/25/2001 3:54 PM
|
Weekly Themes
|
AnnaStrophic
|
06/25/2001 11:14 PM
|
Re: Weekly Themes
|
wwh
|
06/25/2001 11:45 PM
|
Re: Weekly Themes
|
AnnaStrophic
|
06/26/2001 10:20 AM
|
[Duck and cover e]
|
Faldage
|
06/26/2001 10:58 AM
|
Re: Weekly Themes
|
tsuwm
|
06/26/2001 12:28 PM
|
Re: Weekly Themes
|
wwh
|
06/26/2001 1:33 PM
|
Re: Weekly Themes
|
of troy
|
06/26/2001 3:14 PM
|
Re: Weekly Themes
|
Faldage
|
06/26/2001 3:21 PM
|
Re: Weekly Themes
|
maverick
|
06/26/2001 3:28 PM
|
Re: No, no, no, no, no!
|
WhitmanO'Neill
|
06/26/2001 12:56 AM
|
Re: Full Monty
|
WhitmanO'Neill
|
06/26/2001 1:24 AM
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,916
Posts230,359
Members9,209
| |
Most Online7,006 Mar 7th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|