Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#25748 04/03/01 12:32 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
I
Pooh-Bah
OP Offline
Pooh-Bah
I
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
Asked without prejudice.

Don't hang up on 'em; G_d forbid, don't!

So what do you do?

What do you do when they start hurling abuse? I'm not talking about elevated blood pressure, its attendant vitupritive. I'm talking about out-and-out nasty, words meant for vicious, without redeeming social value.

Amazingly, no matter what's being said at the other end, it seems it's worse to end it in the cradle. Not the abuse, but the ending of it that puts an end to friendship, collaboration...?

What do you think?



#25749 04/03/01 01:00 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Was this a Reply to something?

If not, then I don't answer them in the first place.


#25750 04/03/01 01:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
W
wwh Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Dear IP:" out-and-out nasty, words meant for vicious, without redeeming social value."

I sounds as though you are talking about nasty people on telephone. When I could still hear, I used to hang up at first nasty word, unless it was my boss. Courtesy is wasted on nasty people.



#25751 04/03/01 04:01 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Well, Sweetie, there are a number of things that I would do,
depending mostly I guess on who the caller was. I am basing all these on the assumption that it is someone whom I would prefer to maintain contact with. My first
reaction would be to want to hang up and send them a note
saying I would be willing to listen to their concerns when I could be allowed to think of a calm, rational response and not be distracted by the loudness and cursing (if applicable). This is designed to have the same effect as
saying, "when you can be rational", but does not imply judgment of them. When someone feels judged, that's probably the mostly likely thing they're going to base their response on, no matter what the main point of your statement was. After all, the goal (in this instance) is to get them to change their behavior, and setting them off again will not acheive that goal.

Now--the hang-up and send a message method would not be my first choice if I had more investment in maintaining the relationship than they did. (Say, the deal would fall through, or I would lose a long-time friendship.) In this case, I would probably lay the receiver down until the
squawking stopped, then pick it up and ask if they were willing to let me say something. I would probably begin by
telling them that they and their concerns are important to me, and let that sink into a couple seconds of silence.
Then I would probably apologize--do say this first, it can
be disarming--for not being able to get {whichever fits}
their main point, or if I did get the main point of their
argument, their reasons behind it, and would they please
re-state them. If I have in fact managed to catch anything of what their point is, I would re-state that and ask them to clarify whether I got it accurately.

Now--the above would really depend on my judgment of the person at the time: are they normally a rational person who is likely to be lured into the logistics of listing their grievances, and is just really upset about this one thing? If it is someone for whom irrational irateness is a
normal way of behaving, this will not work!

If it is the latter type of person, and you need or want to maintain contact, then you may just have to put up with the abuse. If there is an opportunity to bring it up when they seem willing to really hear you, you might try saying something like, "I really have a hard time when you yell and curse. In amongst all that, I tend to lose track of what your point is." (Again, not judging them yet still aiming towards getting them to change their behavior.) Don't ask, even non-verbally, for them to agree to this
thinly-veiled request. Just let it fall into silence. If they are determined to maintain one-up-man-ship, they will perceive a request like this as a challenge to their alleged superiority, and will respond by renewing efforts to demonstrate this "superiority", rather than visibly accede to the wishes of someone they consider inferior.

Please note: I am not acknowledging the "superior/inferior"
rankings as being true: just that there are some people who perceive things this way.



Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,580
Members9,187
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Karin, JeffMackwood, artguitar, Jim_W, Rdbuffalo
9,187 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 332 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,713
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,931
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5