Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith Talk Forums General Topics Miscellany half-witicism
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Thanks all, public and private. In a way, though, perhaps I am also getting at something more than just the preposition thing, though my argument was mainly linguistical. My reply to Shoshannah:
Thanks for sparing us a long screed – by reducing it to just personal bitching, I suspect you kept the main points of your argument.
What interests me about many of your posts is your readiness to leap to assumptions. You are actually unlikely to find many people in this world who care more passionately about rules than do I – but I prefer rules that are negotiated openly between rational human beings, not handed down as second- or third-hand mantra. I have a pretty good ‘grip’, and a key part of that is keeping in mind the thoughts of Cromwell, beseeching another group of ‘educated, intuitive and intelligent’ people to just consider the possibility that they are wrong. Maintaining that core of humility underpins rationality. I believe your approach is fundamentally irrational, which is why I find your spoutings so disagreeable.
I cannot know your circumstances, as you cannot know mine, which is why I gave my use of ‘real life’ a heavy dose of irony by use of SelloType™. But your arrogant assumption that people being killed (for reasons that I would suggest have a lot to do with just such a failure to negotiate as described) around you gives you some sort of special insight into “TRUTH” is deeply sad. From such closed minds, blood flows as it has throughout mankind’s history.
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted ![]()
half-witicism
Faldage 03/10/2001 9:32 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
wwh 03/11/2001 4:06 PM ![]()
Re: Requiem not an opera
Faldage 03/12/2001 1:19 PM ![]()
Re: Requiem not an opera
maverick 03/12/2001 1:31 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Shoshannah 03/12/2001 10:17 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Bingley 03/13/2001 5:04 AM ![]()
Re: grammar
Capital Kiwi 03/13/2001 9:12 AM ![]()
Re: grammar
belligerentyouth 03/13/2001 9:58 AM ![]()
Re: grammar
maverick 03/13/2001 12:29 PM ![]()
Re: grammar - time out
Max Quordlepleen 03/13/2001 8:04 PM ![]()
Re: grammar - time out
Anonymous 03/13/2001 8:32 PM ![]()
Re: Year One, second chance
wow 03/14/2001 12:51 AM ![]()
Re: grammar - time out
nancyk 03/14/2001 1:54 AM ![]()
Re: time out
tsuwm 03/14/2001 2:14 AM ![]()
Re: time out
Anonymous 03/14/2001 4:58 AM ![]()
Re: time out
Max Quordlepleen 03/14/2001 6:16 AM ![]()
Re: Of shoes and ships
Capital Kiwi 03/14/2001 6:50 AM ![]()
Re: time out
Fiberbabe 03/14/2001 2:05 PM ![]()
Re: time out
wwh 03/14/2001 2:37 PM ![]()
Re: time out
Fiberbabe 03/14/2001 2:44 PM ![]()
Re: time out
tsuwm 03/14/2001 11:58 PM ![]()
Re: time out
wwh 03/15/2001 1:01 AM ![]()
Re: time out
tsuwm 03/15/2001 2:30 AM ![]()
Re: time out
wwh 03/15/2001 10:50 AM ![]()
Re: time out
Anonymous 03/14/2001 3:39 PM ![]()
ceiling wax!
of troy 03/14/2001 3:47 PM ![]()
Re: sealing wacks!
maverick 03/14/2001 4:00 PM ![]()
Re: ceiling wax!
Anonymous 03/14/2001 10:42 PM ![]()
Re: time out
Jazzoctopus 03/14/2001 10:45 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
Shoshannah 03/11/2001 4:50 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
tsuwm 03/11/2001 4:57 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
wwh 03/11/2001 5:08 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
tsuwm 03/11/2001 5:19 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
AnnaStrophic 03/11/2001 5:41 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
Max Quordlepleen 03/11/2001 5:55 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Shoshannah 03/11/2001 7:09 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/11/2001 7:27 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Shoshannah 03/11/2001 7:41 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
AnnaStrophic 03/11/2001 7:55 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
tsuwm 03/11/2001 8:59 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
AnnaStrophic 03/11/2001 9:33 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/12/2001 1:09 AM ![]()
Re: up with which
wow 03/12/2001 1:56 AM ![]()
Re: up with which
of troy 03/12/2001 1:28 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Faldage 03/12/2001 1:49 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wsieber 03/12/2001 2:15 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Faldage 03/12/2001 3:11 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/12/2001 3:28 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wow 03/12/2001 3:31 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/12/2001 3:48 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Faldage 03/12/2001 3:52 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
wwh 03/12/2001 4:07 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Faldage 03/12/2001 4:45 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
wwh 03/12/2001 5:03 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
tsuwm 03/12/2001 5:17 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
maverick 03/12/2001 6:12 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
wow 03/12/2001 9:40 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Shoshannah 03/12/2001 10:29 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
wwh 03/12/2001 10:36 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Shoshannah 03/12/2001 10:49 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Faldage 03/13/2001 1:44 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Hyla 03/13/2001 12:24 AM ![]()
Shall/must/will/should/may
Sparteye 03/13/2001 3:22 PM ![]()
Re: Shall/must/will/should/may
Faldage 03/13/2001 8:21 PM ![]()
Re: Shall/must/will/should/may
wow 03/14/2001 1:01 AM ![]()
Re: clean slate
wwh 03/14/2001 1:31 AM ![]()
Louisiana law
Sparteye 03/14/2001 2:54 PM ![]()
Re: Louisiana law
of troy 03/14/2001 3:16 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Sparteye 03/12/2001 5:02 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Max Quordlepleen 03/12/2001 6:16 PM ![]()
Dr Seuss
Sparteye 03/12/2001 6:28 PM ![]()
Re: Dr Seuss
Max Quordlepleen 03/12/2001 6:36 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
tsuwm 03/12/2001 10:49 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Shoshannah 03/12/2001 10:52 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
tsuwm 03/12/2001 11:12 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/12/2001 11:24 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
wow 03/12/2001 2:05 AM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
Bobyoungbalt 03/12/2001 7:25 PM ![]()
Nice thing about threaded mode
Faldage 03/12/2001 8:43 PM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith Talk