Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith Talk Forums General Topics Miscellany half-witicism
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
pray tell, have all the rules of grammar been swept away….?
[rant]
Earth calling, Earth calling. Wake up, girl, wherever you’ve been the last 140 years, cause you gotta hear the news – not only have “the rules” been swept away, but also so have their basic validity as a linguistic concept. It is now widely taken for granted that like all other meta-language, linguistic constructions such as ‘grammar’ are post-facto creations of the human mind – they are descriptions, models, attempts to find the patterns in what is, not some frumpy schoolmarm-ish code of what must be. Descriptions of how particular speech communities use their variety of language – yes. Guidance notes as to what may therefore be preferable to fit certain social norms – sometimes. Rules – never.
So sorry, as you seen to have an insecure craving for The TRUTH – but RealLife™ is more complicated.
As for your assertion that It may sound awkward, but so what, if it's correct? – I can be bothered to raise nothing more grand than a big fat raspberry.![]()
![]()
If you cannot hear the natural euphony of a language, you are failing to even get to first base. And hence your ability to turn the famous Winston Churchill quote through 180° of meaning - no dabbling in the box of coloured crayons can recompense for that.
[/rant]
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted ![]()
half-witicism
Faldage 03/10/2001 9:32 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
wwh 03/11/2001 4:06 PM ![]()
Re: Requiem not an opera
Faldage 03/12/2001 1:19 PM ![]()
Re: Requiem not an opera
maverick 03/12/2001 1:31 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Shoshannah 03/12/2001 10:17 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Bingley 03/13/2001 5:04 AM ![]()
Re: grammar
Capital Kiwi 03/13/2001 9:12 AM ![]()
Re: grammar
belligerentyouth 03/13/2001 9:58 AM ![]()
Re: grammar
maverick 03/13/2001 12:29 PM ![]()
Re: grammar - time out
Max Quordlepleen 03/13/2001 8:04 PM ![]()
Re: grammar - time out
Anonymous 03/13/2001 8:32 PM ![]()
Re: Year One, second chance
wow 03/14/2001 12:51 AM ![]()
Re: grammar - time out
nancyk 03/14/2001 1:54 AM ![]()
Re: time out
tsuwm 03/14/2001 2:14 AM ![]()
Re: time out
Anonymous 03/14/2001 4:58 AM ![]()
Re: time out
Max Quordlepleen 03/14/2001 6:16 AM ![]()
Re: Of shoes and ships
Capital Kiwi 03/14/2001 6:50 AM ![]()
Re: time out
Fiberbabe 03/14/2001 2:05 PM ![]()
Re: time out
wwh 03/14/2001 2:37 PM ![]()
Re: time out
Fiberbabe 03/14/2001 2:44 PM ![]()
Re: time out
tsuwm 03/14/2001 11:58 PM ![]()
Re: time out
wwh 03/15/2001 1:01 AM ![]()
Re: time out
tsuwm 03/15/2001 2:30 AM ![]()
Re: time out
wwh 03/15/2001 10:50 AM ![]()
Re: time out
Anonymous 03/14/2001 3:39 PM ![]()
ceiling wax!
of troy 03/14/2001 3:47 PM ![]()
Re: sealing wacks!
maverick 03/14/2001 4:00 PM ![]()
Re: ceiling wax!
Anonymous 03/14/2001 10:42 PM ![]()
Re: time out
Jazzoctopus 03/14/2001 10:45 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
Shoshannah 03/11/2001 4:50 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
tsuwm 03/11/2001 4:57 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
wwh 03/11/2001 5:08 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
tsuwm 03/11/2001 5:19 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
AnnaStrophic 03/11/2001 5:41 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
Max Quordlepleen 03/11/2001 5:55 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Shoshannah 03/11/2001 7:09 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/11/2001 7:27 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Shoshannah 03/11/2001 7:41 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
AnnaStrophic 03/11/2001 7:55 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
tsuwm 03/11/2001 8:59 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
AnnaStrophic 03/11/2001 9:33 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/12/2001 1:09 AM ![]()
Re: up with which
wow 03/12/2001 1:56 AM ![]()
Re: up with which
of troy 03/12/2001 1:28 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Faldage 03/12/2001 1:49 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wsieber 03/12/2001 2:15 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Faldage 03/12/2001 3:11 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/12/2001 3:28 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wow 03/12/2001 3:31 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/12/2001 3:48 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Faldage 03/12/2001 3:52 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
wwh 03/12/2001 4:07 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Faldage 03/12/2001 4:45 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
wwh 03/12/2001 5:03 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
tsuwm 03/12/2001 5:17 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
maverick 03/12/2001 6:12 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
wow 03/12/2001 9:40 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Shoshannah 03/12/2001 10:29 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
wwh 03/12/2001 10:36 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Shoshannah 03/12/2001 10:49 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Faldage 03/13/2001 1:44 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Hyla 03/13/2001 12:24 AM ![]()
Shall/must/will/should/may
Sparteye 03/13/2001 3:22 PM ![]()
Re: Shall/must/will/should/may
Faldage 03/13/2001 8:21 PM ![]()
Re: Shall/must/will/should/may
wow 03/14/2001 1:01 AM ![]()
Re: clean slate
wwh 03/14/2001 1:31 AM ![]()
Louisiana law
Sparteye 03/14/2001 2:54 PM ![]()
Re: Louisiana law
of troy 03/14/2001 3:16 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Sparteye 03/12/2001 5:02 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Max Quordlepleen 03/12/2001 6:16 PM ![]()
Dr Seuss
Sparteye 03/12/2001 6:28 PM ![]()
Re: Dr Seuss
Max Quordlepleen 03/12/2001 6:36 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
tsuwm 03/12/2001 10:49 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Shoshannah 03/12/2001 10:52 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
tsuwm 03/12/2001 11:12 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/12/2001 11:24 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
wow 03/12/2001 2:05 AM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
Bobyoungbalt 03/12/2001 7:25 PM ![]()
Nice thing about threaded mode
Faldage 03/12/2001 8:43 PM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics Forums16Topics13,915Posts230,273Members9,208 Most Online4,606
Sep 17th, 2025
Newest Members JerryC, blvd, Tony Hood, Wood Delivery, Forix Richard
9,208 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days) JerryC 1
Top Posters wwh 13,858Faldage 13,803Jackie 11,613wofahulicodoc 11,131tsuwm 10,542LukeJavan8 9,974Buffalo Shrdlu 7,210AnnaStrophic 6,511Wordwind 6,296of troy 5,400
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith Talk