Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith Talk Forums General Topics Miscellany half-witicism
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Well, I don't see an opus number on the score, whatever that means.
Opus means work. Opus 34, e.g., on a piece of music simply means that that piece of music is the 34th piece written by that particular composer. An opera (plural of opus) is so called because it is a collection of works.
The joke is that Verdi was best known for his operas and the music of the Requiem has a very operatic feel to it. There were other aspects of it that the speaker of the workshop mentioned that were operatic in nature but to call it an opera was to ignore its true nature.
It grew out of a single section that Verdi had written for a project that he had started when the Italian poet and novelist Alessandro Manzoni died. Verdi suggested that the great composers of Italy collaborate to compose a Requiem to honor Manzoni and he took on the task of writing the Libera me section. The resulting Requiem was a failure. It was never performed but Verdi built his Requiem on his section. That Requiem was not a failure.
Verdi, by the way, was an agnostic.
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted ![]()
half-witicism
Faldage 03/10/2001 9:32 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
wwh 03/11/2001 4:06 PM ![]()
Re: Requiem not an opera
Faldage 03/12/2001 1:19 PM ![]()
Re: Requiem not an opera
maverick 03/12/2001 1:31 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Shoshannah 03/12/2001 10:17 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Bingley 03/13/2001 5:04 AM ![]()
Re: grammar
Capital Kiwi 03/13/2001 9:12 AM ![]()
Re: grammar
belligerentyouth 03/13/2001 9:58 AM ![]()
Re: grammar
maverick 03/13/2001 12:29 PM ![]()
Re: grammar - time out
Max Quordlepleen 03/13/2001 8:04 PM ![]()
Re: grammar - time out
Anonymous 03/13/2001 8:32 PM ![]()
Re: Year One, second chance
wow 03/14/2001 12:51 AM ![]()
Re: grammar - time out
nancyk 03/14/2001 1:54 AM ![]()
Re: time out
tsuwm 03/14/2001 2:14 AM ![]()
Re: time out
Anonymous 03/14/2001 4:58 AM ![]()
Re: time out
Max Quordlepleen 03/14/2001 6:16 AM ![]()
Re: Of shoes and ships
Capital Kiwi 03/14/2001 6:50 AM ![]()
Re: time out
Fiberbabe 03/14/2001 2:05 PM ![]()
Re: time out
wwh 03/14/2001 2:37 PM ![]()
Re: time out
Fiberbabe 03/14/2001 2:44 PM ![]()
Re: time out
tsuwm 03/14/2001 11:58 PM ![]()
Re: time out
wwh 03/15/2001 1:01 AM ![]()
Re: time out
tsuwm 03/15/2001 2:30 AM ![]()
Re: time out
wwh 03/15/2001 10:50 AM ![]()
Re: time out
Anonymous 03/14/2001 3:39 PM ![]()
ceiling wax!
of troy 03/14/2001 3:47 PM ![]()
Re: sealing wacks!
maverick 03/14/2001 4:00 PM ![]()
Re: ceiling wax!
Anonymous 03/14/2001 10:42 PM ![]()
Re: time out
Jazzoctopus 03/14/2001 10:45 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
Shoshannah 03/11/2001 4:50 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
tsuwm 03/11/2001 4:57 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
wwh 03/11/2001 5:08 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
tsuwm 03/11/2001 5:19 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
AnnaStrophic 03/11/2001 5:41 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
Max Quordlepleen 03/11/2001 5:55 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Shoshannah 03/11/2001 7:09 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/11/2001 7:27 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Shoshannah 03/11/2001 7:41 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
AnnaStrophic 03/11/2001 7:55 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
tsuwm 03/11/2001 8:59 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
AnnaStrophic 03/11/2001 9:33 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/12/2001 1:09 AM ![]()
Re: up with which
wow 03/12/2001 1:56 AM ![]()
Re: up with which
of troy 03/12/2001 1:28 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Faldage 03/12/2001 1:49 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wsieber 03/12/2001 2:15 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Faldage 03/12/2001 3:11 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/12/2001 3:28 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wow 03/12/2001 3:31 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/12/2001 3:48 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Faldage 03/12/2001 3:52 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
wwh 03/12/2001 4:07 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Faldage 03/12/2001 4:45 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
wwh 03/12/2001 5:03 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
tsuwm 03/12/2001 5:17 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
maverick 03/12/2001 6:12 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
wow 03/12/2001 9:40 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Shoshannah 03/12/2001 10:29 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
wwh 03/12/2001 10:36 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Shoshannah 03/12/2001 10:49 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Faldage 03/13/2001 1:44 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Hyla 03/13/2001 12:24 AM ![]()
Shall/must/will/should/may
Sparteye 03/13/2001 3:22 PM ![]()
Re: Shall/must/will/should/may
Faldage 03/13/2001 8:21 PM ![]()
Re: Shall/must/will/should/may
wow 03/14/2001 1:01 AM ![]()
Re: clean slate
wwh 03/14/2001 1:31 AM ![]()
Louisiana law
Sparteye 03/14/2001 2:54 PM ![]()
Re: Louisiana law
of troy 03/14/2001 3:16 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Sparteye 03/12/2001 5:02 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Max Quordlepleen 03/12/2001 6:16 PM ![]()
Dr Seuss
Sparteye 03/12/2001 6:28 PM ![]()
Re: Dr Seuss
Max Quordlepleen 03/12/2001 6:36 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
tsuwm 03/12/2001 10:49 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Shoshannah 03/12/2001 10:52 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
tsuwm 03/12/2001 11:12 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/12/2001 11:24 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
wow 03/12/2001 2:05 AM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
Bobyoungbalt 03/12/2001 7:25 PM ![]()
Nice thing about threaded mode
Faldage 03/12/2001 8:43 PM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith Talk