Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith.org Forums General Topics Miscellany Why are "roots" so unrelated to derived words?
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
OP How does one get from a "root" like "bhel" to the Latin "fulgere" (for example)? This sort of thing mystifies me no end.
E.g., for the word "refulgent" I see:
From Latin refulgere (to radiate light, to reflect), from re- (back) + fulgere (to shine). Ultimately from the Indo-European root bhel- (to shine or burn), which is also the source of blaze, blank, blond, bleach, blanket, and flame. Earliest documented use: before 1500.
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted ![]()
Why are "roots" so unrelated to derived words?
dakkumar 09/01/11 08:26 AM ![]()
Re: Why are "roots" so unrelated to derived words?
Faldage 09/01/11 10:13 AM ![]()
Re: what Faldo said
zmjezhd 09/01/11 01:20 PM ![]()
Re: Why are "roots" so unrelated to derived words?
LukeJavan8 09/01/11 03:57 PM ![]()
Re: Why are "roots" so unrelated to derived words?
Jackie 09/02/11 12:45 AM ![]()
Re: Why are "roots" so unrelated to derived words?
LukeJavan8 09/02/11 03:50 PM ![]()
Re: Why are "roots" so unrelated to derived words?
Jackie 09/03/11 01:52 AM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics Forums16Topics13,915Posts229,990Members9,198 Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members testawad, Bill_L, achz, MAGNVSTALSMA, Burlyfish
9,198 Registered Users
Who's Online Now 0 members (), 696 guests, and 2 robots. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days) A C Bowden 18
Top Posters wwh 13,858Faldage 13,803Jackie 11,613wofahulicodoc 10,956tsuwm 10,542LukeJavan8 9,953Buffalo Shrdlu 7,210AnnaStrophic 6,511Wordwind 6,296of troy 5,400
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith.org