Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith.org Forums General Topics Miscellany Politics and Words
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
OP The one I've been most involved with was "disabled".
The point made by the disabled people that I was working with was that "people with disabilities" was about being recognised as a person first, then as a person with a disability. Those that wanted to be called "disabled" saw themselves as disabled from society by virtue of having a disability as well as because of their specific disability.
I think that the biggest difference is who has put forward the new word - the people to whom the word would apply or others (perhaps wishing to create a euphemism). Use of the word "disabled" has been accompanied by a whole movement towards "disabled people" taking more control of their lives and being more active on committees and in charities. No more "does he take sugar".
It is such a personal subject I'm sure others will disagree.
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics Forums16Topics13,913Posts229,810Members9,187 Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members Karin, JeffMackwood, artguitar, Jim_W, Rdbuffalo
9,187 Registered Users
Who's Online Now 0 members (), 458 guests, and 1 robot. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days) A C Bowden 15
Top Posters wwh 13,858Faldage 13,803Jackie 11,613wofahulicodoc 10,852tsuwm 10,542LukeJavan8 9,944Buffalo Shrdlu 7,210AnnaStrophic 6,511Wordwind 6,296of troy 5,400
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith.org