Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#191363 05/29/10 03:22 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Jackie Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
I was just perusing a section in Geoffrey Nunberg's the way we talk now, and my eye was caught by the unusual title. He says that in the late nineteenth century, Americans began using the words literate and illiterate as a way of classifying people according to whether they could read and write. And that since then, these two words (literate and illiterate) have led "double lives", referring both to basic skills and to broader cultural and intellectual achievements. He also states that recently Americans have expanded the idea of literacy to include "skills and knowledge that don't seem to have any immediate connection to basic reading and writing". He cites such terms as media literacy, economic literacy, geographical literacy, scientific literacy, computer literacy, mathematical literacy, etc.

Is there another language that has a single word for this that includes such a wide variation in meaning?

Here's my real point in making this post: he says that Americans are "skittish" about using the word culture as a positive term, and that "a phrase like 'a person of culture' has an elitist, PBS ring to it". He also asserts that literacy is America's way of getting culture in "through the back door of the schoolroom. Literacy strips culture of its connotations of class and refinement and turns it into a civic duty and a subject matter, something you can objectify and quantify."

I am not sure I agree with this. What do you all think?

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Literate and illiterate we strictly use for language and reading.
I understand your question, but the answer is too complicated. I think we use about three words for what you use, and attached to different subjects of knowledge. One of those words would have to be translated as:"have a good grounding in"- onderlegd
scientifically literate - wetenschappelijk onderlegd.

The second part of your post is not very clear to me.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 956
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 956
a person of culture' has an elitist, PBS ring to it

I think the boundaries of literacy or its percieved status were mostly transcended yonks ago and those that are left not being able to read or write are not entirely culturally deprived rather, slightly less inclined to think what others think. I know in Cook Islands culture that when the English language arrived, those who learned to read and write 'it' were deemed 'more cultured' and looked upon as people to aspire too, a distinction that I have since come to regret due to its negative impact on our native language.

olly #191584 06/17/10 01:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,819
A
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
A
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,819
Jackie I hadn't thought of the use of "________ illiterate" to be a way of avoiding the term culture. In fact I have often seen the expression "culturally illiterate" used. To my ears, illiteracy has an even harsher tone to it than "uncultured," but then again my parents were teachers so illiteracy amounts to something very near total depravity to me. I would classify the use of illiterate in the various ways that you mentioned as simply figurative speech. Sometimes it hits the nail on the head, such as when the subject is something that is about as fundamental as literacy. For example, if a person can't perform simple arithmetic then it's reasonable to say that they are mathematically illiterate. On the other hand if a person is unfamiliar with French New Wave cinema it would be overkill to say that they are "culturally illiterate." (In other words the lack of knowledge is not really a handicap to functioning as an independent adult in society.)

Slightly on topic, an interesting word that I came across not too long ago was aliterate, meaning someone who is able to read but essentially never reads a book.

Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Jackie Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Hmm--I've heard of amoral and asexual, but not aliterate.

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,819
A
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
A
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,819
It's actually a previous Word a Day word from November 2007:


aliterate

A.Word.A.Day--aliterate

This week's theme: adjectives.

aliterate (ay-LIT-uhr-it) noun, adjective

One who is capable of reading but not interested in it.

[From Latin a- (not or without) + litteratus (learned), from littera (letter).]

Today's word in Visual Thesaurus.

Aliterates stand somewhere between literates and illiterates. They can read but don't want to. Whether they can alliterate, we're not sure.

-Anu Garg (words at wordsmith.org)

"The avowed aliterate has relinquished an activity that is uniquely human. (Apes can watch TV)."
Linton Weeks; Essay; The Washington Post; Jul 14, 1996.

X-Bonus
Endless money forms the sinews of war. -Marcus Tullius Cicero, statesman, orator, writer (106-43 BCE)

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
[From Latin a- (not or without) + litteratus (learned), from littera (letter).]

Hmm, the prefix a- (an- before vowels) is from Greek, not Latin. There's a rarish word for an illiterate person, agrammatist.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Jackie Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
agrammatist Who someone this like speaks?

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Who someone this like speaks?

Only an incredible pedant; the OED2 has this lonely entry sans citation:
Quote:
‘An unlearned, illiterate man.’ Bailey 1731; whence in Johnson, etc.
So, they only mention the first two dictionaries it shows up in, and not anybody use of it in writing. Using the new-fangled web thingum, i.e., Google Books, I stumbled upon this mid-19th century pedantic humor:
Quote:
Although I am an agamist, I am no misogamist. In verity, you were not ignote to me prior to my vision of you at our primal adventine gemote. Your catagraph, your epistolary chirography, your neologisms and diorisms, the scribatious and sapiential aspects of your epistolography, had already premonstrated to me that you are no agrammatist, but a sapient philomath, and thus from the very necessitate of the case, I cherished a pre-existimation for you. In my cogitations upon the habilitations of him who is to be my future marital co-mate, I formed the illation, that he must possess the sequacious denotements. (Emphasis mine.) [Letters to Squire Pedant, in the East by Lorenzo Altisonant [pseud. of Samuel Klinefelter Hoshour], an imigrant to the West, 1856.]
Samuel Klinefelter Hoshour (1803-1883) was a 19th century Disciples of Christ preacher and one of the first the superintendents of schools in Indiana. [A Detailed biography online. Scroll to the bottom of the page for an abstract.]

The word is a calque of unlettered and illiterate.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Oompf! This is page on 47 and I did not get to the end of scrolling down, but round page 60 there is a complete Worthless Word of the Day sort of Vocabulary with explanations. ( Useful )

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,651
Members9,187
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Karin, JeffMackwood, artguitar, Jim_W, Rdbuffalo
9,187 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 158 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,758
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,936
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5