Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith Talk Forums General Topics Q&A about words Notoriety
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Me too. What is it with this sentence that does not seem to run smooth? Except for your IMO sensible answer what ìs this? StOriginally Posted By: twosleepyOriginally Posted By: FaldageI will note, however, in my contranimic way, that the meaning for notoriety as used in the NPR item referred to and the sense that Philip Davich would prefer are not exactly polar opposites.
I need some extensive explanation, because I don't even understand that sentence...
A glitsj on top of it,well............
Philip Davich, don't be alarmed please, some particles loose here.
Last edited by BranShea; 12/09/2009 2:06 PM.
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted ![]()
Notoriety
Philip Davich 12/08/2009 3:32 PM ![]()
Re: Notoriety
twosleepy 12/08/2009 5:21 PM ![]()
Re: Notoriety
tsuwm 12/08/2009 6:49 PM ![]()
Re: Notoriety
Faldage 12/09/2009 12:20 AM ![]()
Re: Notoriety
twosleepy 12/09/2009 4:18 AM ![]()
Re: Notoriety
Faldage 12/09/2009 12:00 PM ![]()
si ergo id quo maius cogitari non potest, est in solo intellectu
zmjezhd 12/09/2009 1:20 PM ![]()
Re: si ergo id quo maius cogitari non potest, est in solo intellectu
AnnaStrophic 12/13/2009 3:29 PM ![]()
Re: Notoriety
BranShea 12/09/2009 1:58 PM ![]()
Re: Notoriety
Faldage 12/10/2009 12:16 AM ![]()
Re: Notoriety
BranShea 12/10/2009 3:55 PM ![]()
Re: Notoriety
Faldage 12/11/2009 1:11 AM ![]()
Re: Notoriety
BranShea 12/11/2009 9:15 AM ![]()
Re: Notoriety
Jackie 12/12/2009 1:24 AM ![]()
Re: Notoriety
BranShea 12/12/2009 5:09 PM ![]()
Re: Notoriety
wsieber 12/13/2009 3:07 PM ![]()
Re: Notoriety
Jackie 12/09/2009 3:16 AM ![]()
Re: Notoriety
twosleepy 12/09/2009 4:16 AM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith Talk