|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,773
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,773 |
Forgive me tsu but for the life of me I can't find a link to that dictionary
That I used "the" confirms I'm indeed one of them as you suggest
As to "doggo" at "approx. 2.3017" In spite of my credentials (above) I still can't agree that most of hoi polloi would know it. I would take a vote--in separate thread--to learn how many participants understood "doggo" before today--if I knew how--so if someone would kindly do so I would be much obliged
Note however I omitted the "the" this time
Guys don't be reluctant to admit you didn't know "doggo": I didn't
dalehileman
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
dalehileman
|
11/22/2009 6:03 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
Faldage
|
11/22/2009 6:59 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
dalehileman
|
11/22/2009 8:10 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
tsuwm
|
11/22/2009 10:04 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
dalehileman
|
11/23/2009 5:37 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
tsuwm
|
11/23/2009 6:38 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
zmjezhd
|
11/23/2009 6:50 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
dalehileman
|
11/23/2009 6:52 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
tsuwm
|
11/23/2009 7:26 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
dalehileman
|
11/23/2009 11:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|