|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,773
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,773 |
Well as Fal says it's often a matter of individual experience. However I find it very hard to believe these three terms are used freely in everyday conversation and I doubt likely to be understood by nearly everyone. I suspect you two guys run with an elite group
...but I'd like your rating for today's word. In spite of a BSJ from the U of I, several decades as a tech writer, and a few dozen minor successes in authorship myself I'd place "doggo" as type 3; I guess I was brought up among the hoi polloi
dalehileman
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
dalehileman
|
11/22/2009 6:03 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
Faldage
|
11/22/2009 6:59 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
dalehileman
|
11/22/2009 8:10 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
tsuwm
|
11/22/2009 10:04 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
dalehileman
|
11/23/2009 5:37 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
tsuwm
|
11/23/2009 6:38 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
zmjezhd
|
11/23/2009 6:50 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
dalehileman
|
11/23/2009 6:52 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
tsuwm
|
11/23/2009 7:26 PM
|
Re: Type-1, -2, -3 revisited
|
dalehileman
|
11/23/2009 11:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|