Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
The Pook #180399 11/18/08 03:45 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
This reminds me of the many Americans who believe that "separation of church and state" means that it is forbidden to discuss religion, or things religious, in public schools. This is complete nonsense. It is forbidden to compel students to subscribe to a particular religion (evangelizing), but not to discuss or inform. It's also not "against the constitution" for students to gather on school grounds for a religious purpose, as long as it does not violate any laws and is strictly voluntary. :0)

twosleepy #180400 11/18/08 04:14 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
>to discuss or inform

to discuss or inform in an exclusionary fashion becomes problematic (but now we're approaching that forbidden ground).

tsuwm #180406 11/18/08 08:17 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
Funny, I didn't see the words "in an exclusionary fashion" in what I wrote. Perhaps you're reading something into it? :0)

twosleepy #180408 11/18/08 08:35 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
no; I added those words purposefully -- exclusion is what often happens in the event.

tsuwm #180423 11/19/08 03:20 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
For example, The Pook's assertion that William James's comment is only true if God exists has as an unstated premise that a man has a true existence only if there is God to perceive that true existence. The assertion was worded in such a way as to appear to be a proof of the existence of God. Hence my claim of petitio principii. But perhaps The Pook was offering it as a reductio ad absurdum. One never know, do one?

Faldage #180425 11/19/08 03:42 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
Not quite.

The Pook #180438 11/19/08 04:51 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6
B
stranger
Offline
stranger
B
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6
>sigh<

I thought I was just commenting on AT4Ts that say something essentially critical about religion. It gains nothing, produces nothing. This week has another.

I wasn't stating whether or not religions were opiates of the masses. If religion is not a useful topic here (and of course a warm topic as seen already), to which I agree, then the AT4Ts themselves are suspect. I love the words. Perhaps my method bringing the AT4T to attention was wrong. There are many others far more articulate than me who can say what I wished to say in a better manner. That's why I kept it short. Hmm. and this is loong. ("since brevity is the soul of wit, and tediousness the limbs and outward flourishes, I will be brief ..." -- I follow in your footsteps, Polonius!)

Bob V-Vore

BobVVore #180439 11/19/08 05:16 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
if you have a comment regarding AWAD itself, you should address it to Anu Garg [he seldom posts in these forums unless it is *truly administrative; e.g. regarding a software update.]

you can reach him via the Feedback link at the bottom of this page.

..or via the Contact Us link from within the daily mail, if you get that.

tsuwm #180447 11/20/08 12:29 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6
B
stranger
Offline
stranger
B
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6
Originally Posted By: tsuwm
if you have a comment regarding AWAD itself, you should address it to Anu Garg [he seldom posts in these forums unless it is *truly administrative; e.g. regarding a software update.]

you can reach him via the Feedback link at the bottom of this page.

..or via the Contact Us link from within the daily mail, if you get that.


We are acquainted via previous e-mails. He knows quite well how I feel. He, like many really smart people, thinks highly of his own opinions. In a previous AWAD summary, he does respond to someone's critique of an ad, responding that he wasn't responsible for the content of the ads (??).

However, this moves me to try again.

Thanks

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,580
Members9,187
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Karin, JeffMackwood, artguitar, Jim_W, Rdbuffalo
9,187 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 332 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,713
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,931
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5