Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith Talk Forums General Topics Q&A about words If "quid" means "what" in Latin
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Ceci n'est pas un seing.
Quidditch could also be a combination of the three balls:
Quaffle, Bludger, Snitch
Some of the "special" words in Harry Potter are so-so Latin (expecto patronum - I await a protector except it should be patronus), some are bad Latin (expelliarmus - expello = I thrust away, arma = weapon - but it's a made-up word and the ending makes no sense - is it a 1st person plural verb "we expelliar" or has the noun arma changed declensions and genders), some are not Latin at all (avada kedevra is sort of Hebrew, alohamora is sort of African). Even in the decent Latin spells, it's an unusual mix of first person (I do something), 2nd person imperatives (You do it! Flagrate = You glow!) and just Noun! (ferula = stick - creates a splint and bandage).
But that's probably more than anyone wanted to know... ;-)
Last edited by Myridon; 10/31/2008 4:16 PM.
Well, maybe exspecto patronum. Patronus is in the accusative case because it's the direct object of the verb. British English being non-rhotic, I always assumed Harry and the others were saying expelliamus. But the -r- doesn't make much sense. There's a list of spells on Wikipedia (link).
Ceci n'est pas un seing.
(Exceptronus tsuwm who makes potszebra out of this.)
perhaps we should ask if J.K. Rowling is?
formerly known as etaoin...
Yeah, I expect I didn't notice that because of "expect", but it seems to be expecto in print so it's actually "I comb out a protector."Quote:Patronus is in the accusative case
You're right, I jumped the gun on that.Quote:But the -r- doesn't make much sense.
The spell is "Disarm" so the r is supposedly from arma. If you ignore the "r from arma" connection, expellere, expuli, expulsus should have no 3rd conjugation verb ending with an -iamus (and why one spell with 1st person plural "we"?). If it's not a verb, the nouns based on that verb should be from the supine expulsus, e.g. expulsio (a driving out, expulsion), expulsor/expultrix (one who drives out), etc.
Most of the spells are "I do whatever" but the spell that stops another spell is "(imperative you plural) end the spell!" (finite encantatem). If I can do most things myself, why do I need this mysterious other "y'all" sometimes (or even "we")?
Don't get me started on the school-year-long quidditch season that consists of only three evenly spaced games.
I was. I especially liked The Santaroga Barrier, Hellstrom's Hive, and Dune.
Ceci n'est pas un seing.
Oh, I still am. I was being dyspeptic. The Dune series got less and less likable. Did you know that Bene Gesserit is Latin? It's kind of Dog Hebrew, too.
Ceci n'est pas un seing.
That would be plausible if Quidditch was the title of the heir of Slytherin or something, but I see no connection between a Messiah-like figure and a brutal game. Phonemically it doesn't fit either - the 'ch' in Kwisatz Haderach is like the 'ch' in loch or chemist, not the 'ch' in china.
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith Talk
