Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 456
addict
addict
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 456
Examples want we? Well, the same empty head that conjured "orientate", no doubt from "orientation", could easily produce "personificate". Then once it is embraced by the coddling apologists and put in a dictionary it can make its contribution to "retardify" the language.

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
I have always been suspicious of the word orientation itself. The past passive participle of Latin orior is ortus, so the abstract nominal form should be ortion. But it is funny how one group gets its its up when you verb a noun, as happened with orient, and another comes down pseudo-medievally on back formations such as orientate. The OED (1st brick and mortar version) lists orientate without censure and provides citations from the mid 19th century. Surely long enough to allow its naturalization. I like the hue and heft of orientate but seldom use it unmockingly. But anything that stokes the peevological bonfires is A-OK with me.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
Aramis #176511 04/30/2008 9:07 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
\:\) "retardify"

Aramis #176512 04/30/2008 10:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
old hand
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
 Originally Posted By: Aramis
Then once it is embraced by the coddling apologists and put in a dictionary it can make its contribution to "retardify" the language.

Isn't that a Bushism? I hardly can listen to the man without wanting to tear out my prescriptivist hair... but wouldn't he be the poster child darling of descriptivists? He personifies that make-it-up-as-you-go free-wheeling linguism.... :0)

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
but wouldn't he be the poster child darling of descriptivists? He personifies that make-it-up-as-you-go free-wheeling linguism

This was too much for a soi-disant descriptivist, such as moi, to let go by without an observation. The prescriptivists wouldn't know a real grammatical rule if it walked up and bit them on their tukhes. A descriptivist determines what the rules governing language are by describing how people use said language. Prescriptivists make up rules, which more often than not they themselves don't follow (link, link, and link), or borrow them from some other grammar hooligans. The latter use faulty logic, ignore history, and just get the facts plain wrong.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
twosleepy #176515 05/01/2008 1:21 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
 Originally Posted By: twosleepy
but wouldn't he be the poster child darling of descriptivists? He personifies that make-it-up-as-you-go free-wheeling linguism.... :0)


This is a classic example of the misconception that descriptivists accept any usage as correct as long as one person has used it. This is probably the best refutation (or should that be refution?) of that idea that I have run across.

Aramis #176517 05/01/2008 1:29 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
 Originally Posted By: Aramis
Examples want we? Well, the same empty head that conjured "orientate", no doubt from "orientation", could easily produce "personificate". Then once it is embraced by the coddling apologists and put in a dictionary it can make its contribution to "retardify" the language.

...or how about pontificate, which is what peevologists on both sides of the grammatical fence are doing in superabundantiation!

twosleepy #176518 05/01/2008 1:39 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
 Originally Posted By: twosleepy
 Originally Posted By: Aramis
Then once it is embraced by the coddling apologists and put in a dictionary it can make its contribution to "retardify" the language.

Isn't that a Bushism? I hardly can listen to the man without wanting to tear out my prescriptivist hair... but wouldn't he be the poster child darling of descriptivists? He personifies that make-it-up-as-you-go free-wheeling linguism.... :0)

...which is nowhere near the definition of descriptivism.
Bushisms are simply, well, Bushisms. They are most noticeable not so much for their grammatical errors as for their logical errors. In that sense he is much more aligned with the prescriptivist camp.
...what dzhaymz & faldy said.

Faldage #176522 05/01/2008 3:06 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
old hand
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
I'm sure you all realize my tongue was firmly cheek-planted, and that I was indulging in a little pot-stirring today... But having said that, I think Pullum got this exactly right, Fal:

"But there had better be a third position, because these two extreme ones are both utterly insane."

Most of the contributors on this website seem to represent that "third position", which IMHO is a good thing. As in life, black and white are rare, and the many shades of gray predominate. :0)

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
From the third one of your link , link and link
"I do go by sounds as well as by grammar." Sounds good to me.

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 456
addict
addict
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 456
 Originally Posted By: zmjezhd
I have always been suspicious of the word orientation itself. ...


A. actually did ponder that, wondering why "oriention" is not standing in, just as "workic" should be. There should be considerable lamention over this.

The Pook #176543 05/02/2008 3:03 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
I'd have thought that a peevologist is one who practices peevology, being merely the art or science of peeving.

-joe (adding another peeve to the collection) friday

tsuwm #176544 05/02/2008 4:03 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
old hand
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
So, someone who collects peeves would be a peevemeister? peevehead? peeveophile? :0)

tsuwm #176545 05/02/2008 4:07 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
peevology

English anthology (calqued in Latin as florilegium) 'a collection of epigrams' < Greek ανθολογια (anthologia). So, philology can only mean 'the study of love'? It means something more along the lines of 'love of words'. Compound words are almost as tricky as any other kind of collocation: ancient history teacher anybody?

beppo beppino (the grammatical cynic) venerdì

[Derhotacized one word.]

Last edited by zmjezhd; 05/02/2008 5:34 PM.

Ceci n'est pas un seing.
zmjezhd #176548 05/02/2008 4:48 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
>So, philology can only mean 'the study of love'? It means something more along the lines of 'lover of words'

shirley, beppo, you meant here philologist for 'lover of words'; these things aren't *that* tricky. ;-)

-joe (pettifogulizing) friday

tsuwm #176551 05/02/2008 8:06 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 456
addict
addict
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 456
 Originally Posted By: tsuwm
I'd have thought that a peevologist is one who practices peevology, being merely the art or science of peeving.


Literally it must mean 'the study of peeves'. Some tactical display equipment is said to have 'symbology', which looks like variously shaped markers but is really the study of symbol [even gets a spell-check hit].

Aramis #176552 05/02/2008 8:28 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
symbology
  • Webster's 1913: "The art of expressing by symbols." (link).
  • A-H: "1. The study or interpretation of symbols or symbolism. 2. The use of symbols." (link).
  • Merriam-Webster's online: " 1: the art of expression by symbols; 2: the study or interpretation of symbols; 3: a system of symbols." (link).
  • COED online: "1. the study or use of symbols. 2. symbols collectively." (link).

The resistance of even an uncommon word to a single meaning is refreshing.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
Aramis #176559 05/03/2008 1:46 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
 Originally Posted By: Aramis
Literally it must mean 'the study of peeves'.

That was why I thought the word applied more correctly to zmjezhd than to those who express the peeves in the first place, the peevers or peevophiles. He certainly is a professor of peevology in that sense, as he collects, studies, analyses and critiques various peeves.

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
peeves

For those who object to back-formations, such as orientate and burgle, nota bene that peeve is such a one from peevish.

Regarding the ubi nasus Sphingis est? of a parallel thread, I am reminded of the strange little man who collects noses in Greenaway's masterful Belly of the Architect. A short history of the word peevologist and its meaning(s): (link).


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
bilkirk #177090 05/22/2008 10:35 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
Speaking of verbing nouns, what do folk think of "re-partnered" - a word I came across today in a newspaper article in the sentence:
"She said there was strong evidence to suggest women with low desire regained their interest in sex when they re-partnered."

The Pook #177094 05/22/2008 4:56 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Don't know why you bring this up, but I would suggest you could change divorce to de-partner. Instead of divorced one could be ex-partnered.

BranShea #177105 05/23/2008 1:04 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
 Originally Posted By: BranShea
Don't know why you bring this up, but I would suggest you could change divorce to de-partner. Instead of divorced one could be ex-partnered.

I just thought it was an interesting neologism.
Yes, and maybe if you decided to stay married in a miserable union, you could be said to be "dyspartnered" or "malpartnered"?

Last edited by The Pook; 05/23/2008 1:05 AM.
The Pook #177111 05/23/2008 3:33 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Unlike some neologisms it is at least clear in meaning.

Zed #177114 05/23/2008 10:18 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
 Originally Posted By: Zed
Unlike some neologisms it is at least clear in meaning.


Not that that would mollify the proscriptivists.

Faldage #177129 05/24/2008 12:13 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
 Originally Posted By: Faldage
 Originally Posted By: Zed
Unlike some neologisms it is at least clear in meaning.


Not that that would mollify the proscriptivists.

...that would be the ones who say you should never say anything you haven't said before, right?

The Pook #177134 05/24/2008 12:00 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
 Originally Posted By: The Pook
 Originally Posted By: Faldage
 Originally Posted By: Zed
Unlike some neologisms it is at least clear in meaning.


Not that that would mollify the proscriptivists.

...that would be the ones who say you should never say anything you haven't said before, right?


Seems that way sometimes.

Faldage #177202 06/02/2008 8:26 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 456
addict
addict
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 456
 Originally Posted By: Faldage

...This[/url] is probably the best refutation (or should that be refution?) of that idea that I have run across.


That is an excellent point in that 'refution' would at least reduce the risk of being subjected to 'refutate' often enough for the apologists to put it in a dictionary.

zmjezhd #177922 07/03/2008 8:32 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1
stranger
stranger
Offline
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1
Don't you think that a modicum of verbification has added richness to our language? I think what people object to are today's countless "verbifications of the moment". I'm talking about the tendency to turn a noun into a verb in order to sound a) importantly busy and b)importantly trendy.

I am totally inconsistent in my views on this subject. I happily microwave food, access records, and go antiquing. Professionally, I have been known to say that a company headquarters in_____ or has partnered with _____, but I am somewhat ashamed of these crimes against grammar. I simply must draw the line at limosining somewhere, re-purposing something, gifting someone, or architecting a business plan.

The Word Lady
Words: Exploring Journalism, PR, and Literature
http://words-elizabeth@blogspot.com

Word Lady #177984 07/05/2008 8:14 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Hello Lady
I agree, the richness of English is in large part due to it's flexibility, so is the messiness of English.
every blessing carries a curse.

Zed #177994 07/05/2008 4:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 132
member
member
Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 132
Curb, date, elbow, head, interview, panic, park, service, feature, chair, loan, office and contact were all nouns that were later verbed. Invite, command, meld and request were verbs that were later nouned. Past was an adjective that was later nouned. Clean and obsolete were adjectives that were later verbed.

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Don't you think that a modicum of verbification has added richness to our language?

Folks use language to communicate. In doing so, they tend to use and mold their language to that purpose. It's a fairly normal phenomenon. English, like other fairly analytic languages (link), can easily use a word of one lexical category (link) as a different one (e.g., verbing nouns, nouning verbs) without resorting to affixation as in more synthetic languages (link), such as Latin. The tendency of some to abhor this natural and common linguistic process is more likely a transference of the general disdaining of novelty in the vocabulary, coupled with a loathing on any hint of polysemy. (And welcome to the board. I took a look at your blog, but you may want to fix the link.)


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
but, lest we forget:
Verbing weirds language. - Hobbes

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
 Originally Posted By: tsuwm
but, lest we forget:
Verbing weirds language. - Hobbes


Was that Hobbes or Calvin said that?

Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
I think you're right, but it was Hobbes (as usual) that made the telling point:

 Code:
Calvin:  I like to verb words.
Hobbes:  What?
Calvin:  I take nouns and adjectives and use them as 
         verbs. Remember when 'access' was a thing? 
         Now, it's something you do. It got verbed. 
         Verbing weirds language.
Hobbes:  Maybe we can eventually make language a 
         complete impediment to understanding.
 -Bill Watterson, Calvin and Hobbes

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
 Originally Posted By: tsuwm

 Code:
Hobbes:  Maybe we can eventually make language a 
         complete impediment to understanding.
 -Bill Watterson, Calvin and Hobbes


Hey, why not? We invented language so we could lie anyway.

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 390
enthusiast
enthusiast
Offline
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 390

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
old hand
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876

twosleepy #178147 07/12/2008 10:05 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
If y'all like verbing nouns, y'all'll love nouning verbs.

Go ahead, read all the comments.

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2025 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0