One man's crudity is another's truth... not that they are necessarily (n)either polar opposites (n)or mutually *inclusive, but... with my example, it is *exactly the use of the word(s) that is in question, not unacceptable marketing, or (dog dibrof) what the words are actually supposed to mean (as I so easily masked).

*My point.

I'll replace one letter with an *assterisk... lemme know if I chose an decrudifying one.

Kinda like when FCC chooses to bleep out "the" word, blurr the mouth, yet really can't do anything about the context or the fact that everyone on the planet knows.... actually thinks to themselves the sound of the word. Rather foolish and self defeating.