It seems, etaoin, that in this particular pissing match, you are standing downwind of me.
It is obvious from the way you are speaking that you equate "newly added" with "newly coined". But you fail to see that the number of words added per day will include a percentage of words that have been around a while and are being added belatedly to the UD. In other words, the number of words added to the UD is not representative of the number of words being coined.
>I think you need to re-read my post again, Hydra. I never said that the UD wasn't valuable.
You said that most of the words in the UD were "new and untested", and implied they were therefore unworthy of being discussed on these boards. Would you still have me believe that that leaves open the possibility you believe the UD is a valuable resource?
