Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,773
D
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
D
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,773
In today's climate of Political Correctness, Helen, it's best to always avoid racial or National references of any kind, even if complimentary, as any such allusion, however neutral, will be interpreted by the PC crowd as pejorative and racist


dalehileman
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
in intercourse . . . ."

ooooh, aaaaaaaaaaahhh, ooh, yessss.


TEd
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
I would consider "tar-baby" to be offensive because, except in the Uncle Remus story, I have only heard it used as a racial slur. After decades of it's being used to offend I am surprised that an American politician would expect it to be taken any other way.

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,529
T
veteran
Offline
veteran
T
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,529
Quote:

I would consider "tar-baby" to be offensive because, except in the Uncle Remus story, I have only heard it used as a racial slur. After decades of it's being used to offend I am surprised that an American politician would expect it to be taken any other way.




Sure thing, Zed, if you don't mind rewriting history for the sake of cowardly politicians and disregarding conventional meanings on the outside chance that it might offend.


http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/index.pperl?date=19990212

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5
Jon Offline OP
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5
I think perhaps you misunderstand me. I think Disney has good reason to keep Song of the South in a vault, but I'm not in favor of censorship of words, thoughts, literature, or films. I'm perfectly comfortable with the notion of Song of the South, The Anarchists' Cookbook, and even Mein Kampf being available in my local public library. They don't have a place on my personal reading list, but they're a part of the historical record of what was deemed appropriate to publish at various points in time. We need those records to understand the history of those times.

Surely you understand why the minstrel-like image of Uncle Remus offends so many people, even if you, yourself aren't offended? That's why I say it's problematic. I'm not trying to police what anyone says; I'm just trying to foster what I hope is an interesting discussion.

Ultimately, each person is responsible for their own speech acts. To one extent or another, when we write or speak, it's for the purpose of causing a change in our listeners or readers. The question I ask is simply to what extent we should consider how others might misinterpret our intent.

Sadly, I'll probably think twice before using the word "niggardly" or the phrase "tar baby" in the future, even though I think they're both perfectly acceptable turns of phrase. In the abstract there's no hate in either one of them, but as your indignation shows, no matter how careful a person is in what he says, there's always the possibility of being misperceived.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526

I've only heard it used one time with any frequency. When I was a teenager, a black woman at the end of our building always referred to her kids as tarbabies. I don't think she meant to convey any evil intent by it.

At the time, I had never heard the word used by anyone before. I had assumed she just made it up on the spot. I'm not sure whether it would occur to me to use this on other people, but I've thought several times about referring to my youngest daughter in this way, as she tends to get very dark during the summer.

OTOH, there are attempts to silence people from saying things on the basis that saying those things in those particular ways is necessarily racist. For example, if a white person were to talk about "asian mothers," she would almost certainly be met with ridicule and scorn. Any time my kids are talking with other asian or half-asian kids, an inevitable topic of conversation involving mutual mocking and commiseration, is their experiences with their asian mothers. If you look on the web, you might even find a few websites, including videos, of asian kids poking fun of their parents.

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
themilum
Not sure I understand you. How was I "disregarding conventional meanings on the outside chance that it might offend?" I was surprised that a political figure would use a term that I thought had been used as a slur for decades and had therefore adopted this derogatory meaning as it's conventional meaning. It is hardly an outside chance or overly sensitive to be offended if someone uses a phrase that has often been used by others deliberately to offend. Given the wide variety available in the English language, surely a word or phrase without that connotation could be found. I would consider this simple courtesy not political correctness.

edit - I changed the above because on rereading it sounded rather strident and it wasn't meant to.

Last edited by Zed; 08/01/06 11:11 PM.
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,529
T
veteran
Offline
veteran
T
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,529
Quote:

themilum
Not sure I understand you. How was I "disregarding conventional meanings on the outside chance that it might offend?" I was surprised that a political figure would use a term that I thought had been used as a slur for decades and had therefore adopted this derogatory meaning as it's conventional meaning. It is hardly an outside chance or overly sensitive to be offended if someone uses a phrase that has often been used by others deliberately to offend. Given the wide variety available in the English language, surely a word or phrase without that connotation could be found. I would consider this simple courtesy not political correctness.

edit - I changed the above because on rereading it sounded rather strident and it wasn't meant to.




Yeah, Zed, you do that.

But in doing so you will fail to impart a small bit of history to the people that you feel you must protect.

I reached adulthood in the segregated South.
Never, I say, never, did I ever hear anyone refer to a colored child as a tar baby. Down South, you see, we love babies.

And, as well, back then no one would be so insulting to suggest to another human being (black or white) that he was incapable of making the distinction between a parable and an insult.

I think that this little tidbit of paternalism is a product of the North.

Too bad.

Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Quote:

never, did I ever hear anyone refer to a colored child as a tar baby.




check out Toni Morrison's or Salman Rushdie's usage of the Tar Baby imagery. They ain't talkin' about children.

Ooh Tar Baby yeah you got me stuck on you. Ooh Tar Baby and I can't get loose it's true. Come on Tar Baby won't you hold me tight, we can stick together all through the night. Ooh Tar Baby and maybe I'm in love with you. (from The Ground Beneath Her Feet)

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5
Jon Offline OP
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5
Another article on this issue that appeared in the Boston Herald contains a few more reactions to Romney's statement:

http://news.bostonherald.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=150679

One comment in particular caught my attention:

Maurice Lewis, a former Boston television reporter who
is black, said of Romney’s choice of words, “I just think
it’s reflective of how he sees people who don’t look like
him. Words like tar baby and pickaninny are deeply rooted
in the segregation of America. They don’t have an
ever-changing, ever-expanding meaning.”


What really made this comment stand out for me was the same thing that sparked my original post: the notion that the commonly understood meaning of this phrase is a slur. These comments, and those posted in this forum show that this is true for some, and not for others. Do dictionaries exhibit bias by not mentioning the negative connotation of the term?

Perhaps the difference in meaning falls along regional lines, or perhaps it's racial, I don't know. I'd agree with Lewis that these phrases are deeply rooted in America's history of segregation and slavery, but I think the notion of any word having a static meaning is absurd. Some change more slowly than others to be sure, but language can be as fluid as a glacier, or an ocean.

Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,580
Members9,187
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Karin, JeffMackwood, artguitar, Jim_W, Rdbuffalo
9,187 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 169 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,713
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,931
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5