|  | 
| | 
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jul 2000 Posts: 3,467 Carpal Tunnel |  
| Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Jul 2000 Posts: 3,467 | 
The Charlotte paper had a story that led off:
 A Charlotte woman admitted Thursday to stealing another woman's identity and using it to by a Lincoln Continental.
 
 Is the first to in the sentence correct?  I would not have put it in there, though if I had written pled guilty instead of admitted I would have used.  And if I had said confessed, but I don't think it's correct to add the word to to the verb admit.  Any thoughts?
 
 Also, a Continentl?  A woman of absolutely no taste!  If you are gonna steal steal a real car like a Lamborghini.  Speaking of which, a neighbor of mine is bringing his Lambo up from SC next week and has told me I can drive it!!!!!
 
 TEd
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  May 2005 Posts: 456 addict |  
|   addict Joined:  May 2005 Posts: 456 | 
It seems a bit more eloquent with the 'to' included, and although 'admitted to' and 'confessed to' are synonymous, 'admitted' alone can be more ambiguous in meaning,  ne c'est pas ? |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Aug 2001 Posts: 11,071 Likes: 2 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Aug 2001 Posts: 11,071 Likes: 2 | 
I observe that some prepositions in this kind of context are subject to periPondian idiosyncrasy:
 "...if there is an institution in Great Britain which is not susceptible of any improvement at all, it is the House of Peers!" (emphasis added)
 
 But I digress.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 13,803 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 13,803 | 
I think you could go either way.  Some publications may have style manuals that prefer one to the the other. |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Nov 2000 Posts: 3,439 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Nov 2000 Posts: 3,439 | 
Hear! Hear! Faldage hit it on the button.In newspapers/print media space is a concern
 so the "to" is superfluous and a bit too too!
 Fer'instance, most Editors warn against "located at"  as "at" stand alone perfectly well.
 "The theater is at 27 Pleasant Street"
 
 
 
Last edited by wow; 05/27/2006 2:52 PM.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Mar 2000 Posts: 1,027 old hand |  
|   old hand Joined:  Mar 2000 Posts: 1,027 | 
To my ears, "admitted  to  " has a ring of legalese about it. It goes well with "helping police with their inquiries"   . |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Apr 2000 Posts: 3,065 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Apr 2000 Posts: 3,065 | 
I think both 'admitted stealing' and 'admitted to stealing' are acceptable, but 'admitted' and 'stealing' being separated by another word makes the 'to' obligatory.
 Actually I find the fact that there's no 'on' with 'Thursday' and the confusion between 'by' and 'buy' far more disturbing.
 
 Bingley
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 13,803 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 13,803 | 
Quote:
 I think both 'admitted stealing' and 'admitted to stealing' are acceptable, but 'admitted' and 'stealing' being separated by another word makes the 'to' obligatory.
 
 Actually I find the fact that there's no 'on' with 'Thursday' and the confusion between 'by' and 'buy' far more disturbing.
 
 
 
 
 The version without the 'on' is common USn journalistic style, the 'by' for 'buy' is a perfect example of the inadequacy of spell-checkers.
 |  |  |  | 
 | 
| 
 |