Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith Talk Forums General Topics Miscellany A step forward for Wikipedia
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Thinkst thou so? I am not sure. I liked the 'unregulated' aspect of Wiki. I am fully capable of excersising my own judgement of the content (as per the recent 'snopes' issue). Time and exposure will likely purge invalid content, and I always thought that was the entire intent of Wiki.
Either way, I am sure this was a necessary change brought about by legal shi(t)ssues that should never have come to pass in a reasonable society. Apologize for my Gaulle...
Will we never be sensible?
Rm
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted ![]()
A step forward for Wikipedia
sjmaxq 12/05/2005 10:59 PM ![]()
Re: A step forward for Wikipedia
Jackie 12/06/2005 1:19 AM ![]()
Re: A step forward for Wikipedia
inselpeter 12/06/2005 1:49 AM ![]()
Re: A step forward for Wikipedia
Rainmaker 12/06/2005 9:49 PM ![]()
Re: A step forward for Wikipedia
sjmaxq 12/06/2005 10:14 PM ![]()
Re: A step forward for Wikipedia
inselpeter 12/07/2005 1:05 AM ![]()
Re: A step forward for Wikipedia
belligerentyouth 12/07/2005 12:13 PM ![]()
Re: A step forward for Wikipedia
wsieber 12/09/2005 8:58 AM ![]()
Re: A step forward for Wikipedia
Faldage 12/09/2005 10:31 AM ![]()
Re: A step forward for Wikipedia
belligerentyouth 12/09/2005 10:37 AM ![]()
Re: A step forward for Wikipedia
Faldage 12/10/2005 12:16 AM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics Forums16Topics13,915Posts230,266Members9,208 Most Online4,606
Sep 17th, 2025
Newest Members JerryC, blvd, Tony Hood, Wood Delivery, Forix Richard
9,208 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days) JerryC 1John Fox 1
Top Posters wwh 13,858Faldage 13,803Jackie 11,613wofahulicodoc 11,126tsuwm 10,542LukeJavan8 9,974Buffalo Shrdlu 7,210AnnaStrophic 6,511Wordwind 6,296of troy 5,400
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith Talk