Quote:
I hadn't looked at this thread until now. I see the ad hominen attacks again. Wanna give it a rest and discuss words/language in a courteous way, HL? We're not idiots. Pretend it's a cocktail party without the cocktails. Would you address someone in person the way you are cyberly addressing people here?
Yawn.
Read my post again. Whatever you choose to make of my tone, I am still discussing the interpretation of phylactery.
It is your post that has broken free of a discussion of words into sanctimonious admonishment.
Summation: The accuser's false accusation commits the very offence it falsely accuses the falsely accused of.
Verdict: In the Homo Loquens' Taxonomy of Intelligence, the prosecutrix, yclept Anastrophic, in consequence of pressing false charges, hilarious self contradiction, misspelling ad hominem and generally just not knowing how to distinguish between jocose banter and an actual ad hominem argument, is to be assigned a temporary place among the lower order of Idiota, genus Homo Sententia Ineptus, pending contradistinction by contra-suggestible counteraction.
Last edited by Homo Loquens; 12/03/2005 11:08 AM.