|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379 |
>> nurture<<
or lack thereof
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379 |
>>But, insel, you aksed<<
Then "not one" *or* "not any" -- it was your teacher's maxim I was doubting.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290 |
Ceci n'est pas un seing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065 |
I was born on a Sunday Bingley
Bingley
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027 |
In cases like this, the rhythm of the sentence is often the deciding factor. In my ears, your sentence without "of" sounds better.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613 |
One thing that no one (not one of the responders  ) has mentioned is the use of 'of' when 'all' is singular; at least in the examples I can think of, 'all of' is required. "How much of that book have you read so far?" "All of it."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379 |
>>All of it.<<
"All of it" is a fragment. The full sentence would read, "I have read all of it," for which you can substitute, "I have read it all."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613 |
Or...you can not substitute!  Gee, I wonder if this post will be on the new place?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379 |
And if you don't, you're using a colloquialism.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,915
Posts229,975
Members9,198
|
Most Online3,341 Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
0 members (),
1,872
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|