|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757 |
> 93.687% more likely to believe one that has more than four significant figures
and are 100% unable to evaluate relative risks or distinguish between likelihood of an event and the seriousness of the event's occurrence. See, for example, that large numbers have foresaken the London tube recently in order to take their lives in their hands on the statistically far more dangerous use of bicycles on London's crowded roads...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 |
100% unable to evaluate relative risks
I don't believe that. It's got only one significant figure.
Now, if you'd said 100%±3dB…
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757 |
> if you'd said 100%±3dB…
I can't shout that loud!
More people died on UK roads in traffic 'accidents' (ie, avoidable human misjudgments and errors) in the seven days following the first tube bombs than in that event. No two-minute silence or fancy church services for all those deaths. More additional deaths were caused in the USA by people taking to the roads in the year-long post 9/11 'I won't fly' frenzy than died in the twin towers themselves. Strange thing, risk assessment...
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,915
Posts229,850
Members9,197
| |
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
|
0 members (),
690
guests, and
2
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
