Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
#124939 03/12/04 10:23 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
I
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
I
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
>>and he didn't say boo<<

I've heard it, but never (before) used it.


#124940 03/12/04 12:29 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
G
addict
Offline
addict
G
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
Re politician's response: "he didn't say 'Boo.'"

He didn't say "Boo!", TEdRem, because he was too scared to say anything at all.

A politician really only has 2 choices when responding to a question in public.

He can supply the predictable, politically correct answer or he can pretend he didn't hear you in which case you go away saying "He didn't say Boo."

When a politician "doesn't say Boo", he is actually agreeing with you, but he doesn't want to be quoted on it. [Actually, you only think he is agreeing with you, which is precisely the genius of the "doesn't say Boo" answer.]

It is not generally understood that there are more "didn't say Boo" answers supplied on the hustings than there are politically correct answers.

That's the way most of the "undecided" votes get decided.

Most people think that politics is the art of "spinning doctoring". But, actually, spin doctoring is over-rated. It's mostly the art of ducking the question.

The only thing "undecided" voters have in common is the fact that they have virtually nothing in common at all. In fact, they can't agree on anything. The "doesn't say Boo" answer is tailor-made for them.

Most elections turn on the "undecided" vote. "Doesn't say Boo" answers usually turn the tide.


#124941 03/12/04 01:09 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 180
member
OP Offline
member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 180
he didn't say 'Boo.'" Which meant that he didn't respond at all.

My grandmother used Boo that way. I've heard several people in the Midwest say that sort of thing, actually.

I just remembered. Wasn't there a character in To Kill a Mockingbird named Boo?


#124942 03/12/04 02:32 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
why boo and not coo, goo, or soo I think it is a question of the least effort on forming an "attack consonant" at the beginning of a sound utterance. The other consonants require more complex shaping of the mouth. I could also imagine that the contemptful labial originated from spitting..


#124943 03/12/04 02:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 771
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 771
> Wasn't there a character in To Kill a Mockingbird named Boo?

Yes, Boo Radley. And there was a character in Monsters, Inc. named Boo also.



#124944 03/12/04 03:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
I don't see how the voiced bilabial stop, /b/, is any easier to pronounce than its velar /g/ or dental /d/ cousins. Phonæsthesia (sometimes sound symbolism) is problematic at best for me. It seems to be closely coupled with a particular language's phonology. Think of nasals in English, /m/ (written hmmm) is positive though it's also a bilabial. And not all nasals are positive: e.g., /N/ (the final consonant in sing) sounds slightly negative to my anglophone ear. Take the vowels in English: the lax back vowels /a/, /o/, /u/ sound positive, but their tense counterparts /O/, /U/. (The lax/tense contrast is sometimes called open/closed in European linguistics.) Compare front lax vowels: /i/ and /e/ versus their counterparts /I/, /E/, and perhaps /æ/. Diphthongs and triphthongs bring a whole 'nother dimension into the mix.


#124945 03/12/04 03:51 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
the /b/ or /m/ are in the default mouth position. All you've got to do to start the word is open your mouth and do the /oo/, the /m/ or, more likely, the /b/ (it's more plosive and thus more forceful) just happens as your mouth opens assuming you start the sound before you open your mouth, which I don't take to be much of a suppose.


#124946 03/12/04 04:00 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
... as well as the unvoiced /p/. I'm sure most of y'all know this already, but it bears repeating: babies' first sounds are generally those "defaults," and then (thus?) attached to their mama and papa.


#124947 03/12/04 04:15 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
Yes, the lips are closed for the bilabials (hence their name). The totally relaxed vocal tract produces an /a/ sound. Experiment: take a cardboard cylinder from a roll of paper handtowels. Blow a raspberry into one end. You get a good approximation of a neutral /a/ vowel. How is close one's lips any easier than closing one's velum? I just don't get it.

I think it boils down to sounds that I make normally in my language (i.e., my phonemic inventory) are by definition easier than sounds made by people who speak other languages.


#124948 03/12/04 04:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
Sorry, but I think that bilabials are easier for babies to reproduce because you can see the point and manner of articulation. I've often heard the bilabial-infant story, but I've never seen any cross-linguistic evidence or statistics to back it up. It'll be anecdotal for me until then.


Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,580
Members9,187
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Karin, JeffMackwood, artguitar, Jim_W, Rdbuffalo
9,187 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 668 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,713
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,931
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5