Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
#124908 03/11/04 06:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
You got exclusive ORs (XOR) and inclusive ORs (OR). A XOR B is true for A true or B true, but not for A and B true. A OR B is true for A true, B true or A and B true. I.e., A and B with the same truth value gives a false XOR but a true OR value. If neither A nor B is true then A XOR B and A OR B are both false.


#124909 03/11/04 07:25 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
G
addict
Offline
addict
G
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
You got exclusive ORs (XOR) and inclusive ORs (OR).

Understood.

But are the "exclusive ORs" the same thing as "the explict exclusive ORs", which are really "the explicitly exclusive ORs"?

How "exclusive" does an "OR" have to be to be "explicit"? Or "explicitly exclusive"? Or vice versa.

Come to think of it, isn't "the exclusive OR" explicit enough without adding the word "explicit" [or the word "explicitly"]?

Just tinking with ya, Faldage.



#124910 03/11/04 07:29 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
'Exclusive OR' is a noun phrase. The 'explicit' is modifying the whole phrase and not just 'exclusive'.


#124911 03/11/04 07:39 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
G
addict
Offline
addict
G
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
The 'explicit' is modifying the whole phrase and not just 'exclusive'.

I'm probably out of my element here, but what's the difference between an "explicit exclusive OR" and an "exclusive OR"?

Is one a little more exclusive than the other?

Just tinking with ya.




#124912 03/11/04 08:09 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
The common usage of the English language word 'or' is ambiguous. While it is normally taken to be exclusive, this is not always the case. By 'explicit exclusive OR' I simply mean that the interpretation that it be an inclusive OR is disallowed. It is no different than a regular exclusive OR in any way.

Sorry, I didn't read the white before I posted. We don't pay you to tink.


#124913 03/11/04 08:25 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
G
addict
Offline
addict
G
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
It is no different than a regular exclusive OR in any way.

That pretty much clears it up. Thank you.

The reason you don't pay me to tink is because you do most of my best tinking for me.




#124914 03/11/04 11:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
but is it worth a tinkers damn?


#124915 03/12/04 12:12 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
G
addict
Offline
addict
G
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
but is it worth a tinker's damn?

To you and me, certainly not. But to a tinker, his dam is worth damn near everything.

A tinker without a dam is like a hockey player without a helmut. A few pricks can take all the fun out of the game.


#124916 03/14/04 06:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 555
M
addict
Offline
addict
M
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 555
And then, there's caterwaul


#124917 03/14/04 07:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
From the Middle English caterwawlen 'to yowl like a tomcat.' Cf. German Katzenjammer 'hangover; crapulence' from Katzen 'cats' + Jammer 'bitchiness, lamentation, misery'; though German Kater 'hangover' may be from either catarrh or from Kater 'tomcat'.


Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,651
Members9,187
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Karin, JeffMackwood, artguitar, Jim_W, Rdbuffalo
9,187 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 158 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,758
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,936
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5