| | 
 
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Nov 2000 Posts: 866 old hand |  
| old hand Joined:  Nov 2000 Posts: 866 | 
'tis the anniversary. RIP Ritchie, Buddy and BB. Waddya reckon - should Don MacLean be afforded the highest wordie status for his song's lyrics?  Or was it just a ramble loosely cobbled together in an overpowering fit of self indulgence?http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a3_398b.html  for them that's interested. stales  |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Apr 2000 Posts: 10,542 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Apr 2000 Posts: 10,542 | 
an aside; on another page we find this subhead:Fighting Ignorance Since 1973
 (It's taking longer than we thought)
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Mar 2000 Posts: 11,613 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Mar 2000 Posts: 11,613 | 
Neat link, stales, in that includes words from the man himself (these come after he indicates he has not and will not give answers):  songwriters should make their statements and move on, maintaining a dignified silence. --Don McLean, Castine, Maine 
 Now, I happen to really like this song, and Vincent  too (hi, lusy!) which in these two cases mean I also like and have some respect for Don McLean.  So I will say that possibly some of his terms are actual references; but I agree with Mr. Adams that the most likely truth for some of them is that they rhyme.
 
 For many other songwriters, and I have to say for artists (painters) too, my personal opinion is that quite often there isn't any "deep" [significant look e] meaning.  They just put a bunch of words down that sound good together, because they sound good together.  Period.  Speaking of periods--I agree with the character Charlene from the old show Designing Women, when she was talking about how supposedly-sophisticated art critics come up with hidden meanings in a painting that consists of a big red dot.  She says, "Come on--it's just a big ol' red dot!"
 
 
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Mar 2000 Posts: 11,613 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Mar 2000 Posts: 11,613 | 
tsuwm, I couldn't find your page, but I did find this:http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a4_065.html I thought we had discussed this topic before, but a search on pompatus gave no results, and I didn't remember the explanation given in this link, anyway. |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 13,803 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 13,803 | 
Or, as the English professor said to Isaac Asimov, "Just because you wrote it what makes you think you have any idea what it's about?"
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Apr 2000 Posts: 10,542 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Apr 2000 Posts: 10,542 | 
which leads us directly to the "deconstructionists".
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 130 member |  
|   member Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 130 | 
Bad news on the doorSTEPI couldn't take one more STEP
 Er, genius?
 Sorry, that couplet always bugged the heck out of me!
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Sep 2000 Posts: 4,757 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Sep 2000 Posts: 4,757 | 
I know what you mean.  But digging a bit deeper, although the word appears and sounds the same, the referent is different: in one case it's a physical construction
 12. a. A flat-topped structure, normally made of stone or wood and some six or seven inches high, used, singly or as one of a series, to facilitate a person's movement from one level to another
 
 and in the other it's a human pace:
 
 1. a. An act of bodily motion consisting in raising the foot from the ground and bringing it down again in a fresh position; usually, an act of this kind as constituting by repetition the progressive motion...  (OED2)
 
 It could also suggest a dance step, in the context of the music dying.
 
 In addition there is also the internal rhyme of door/more... which even Jackie would prolly make rhyme!!  eg
 
 but hey, if it doesn't work for you, there are plenty of songs to go round  :)
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jul 2003 Posts: 3,230 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Jul 2003 Posts: 3,230 | 
> there are plenty of songs to go round :)
 Really? I thought the song remains the same.
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 13,803 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 13,803 | 
I thunk he were referring to the odd, hiccuppy sort of rhythm:
 on the DOOR step
 
 take one more STEP
 
 is how it should go, but you get that
 
 take one MORE step
 
 plus the more is jammed up against the step a little too hard.  They do it to fit the rhythm of doorstep, but.
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Sep 2000 Posts: 4,757 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Sep 2000 Posts: 4,757 | 
take one more STEP
 is how it should go, but you get that
 
 take one MORE step [e.a.]
 
 
 How so?  For me that simply reinforced the meaning that there have been a lot of steps taken already but.
 
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 13,803 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 13,803 | 
simply reinforced the meaning 
 I've rolled them both around on my tongue and I don't hear the McLean rhythm as being natural for the emphasis you're suggesting.  I get that meaning just from the syntax of the whole statement.  I stand by my analysis.  Not that it's bothered me as much as it seems to bother Only Doug.  Just another tick on the old why-do-they-provoke-such-visceral-reactions life list.
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jun 2002 Posts: 7,210 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Jun 2002 Posts: 7,210 | 
why-do-they
 I heard once that fanaticism is the surest sign of doubt...
 
 
 
 formerly known as etaoin...
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 13,803 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 13,803 | 
the surest sign of doubt
 So, cygne, get to Boston much?  Know how to tell who made eye contact?
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 2,661 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 2,661 | 
Just another tick on the old why-do-they-provoke-such-visceral-reactions life list.Speaking of "but", "door step" goes up and in, "more step" comes down and out...  ...talk to me... ********* Only Doug? It sounds like such a Lonely Doug!   |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Mar 2001 Posts: 4,189 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Mar 2001 Posts: 4,189 | 
For many other songwriters, and I have to say for artists (painters) too, my personal opinion is that quite often there isn't any "deep" [significant look e] meaning. They just put a bunch of words down that sound good together, because they sound good together.
 Jackie, I have to emphatically disagree. As a songwriter the words are far too important to the telling of a story just be be some abstract collage thrown together, that's absurd. A good song always tells a story, especially in folk music, but even if it's a pop love song.
 From Woody Guthrie, Bill Monroe, and Hank Williams, to George and Ira Gershwin and Cole Porter, to Bob Dylan, The Beatles, Simon & Garfunkel, and Joni Mitchell, et al...folk, rock, show, bluegrass, opera, country...the words *are important. There are some strange pieces that seem to make sense to the *writer (see MacArthur Park), but whose failure of imagery render them a *seeming abstraction, but no one writes lyrics without some purposeful cohesion to the words...that's what makes it a song. Even Frank Zappa's avant-garde, "abstract" lyrics were chosen to create a cohesive motion in subtext to the music.
 
 Yes, there were the Surrealists among the poets like Rimbaud who wrote in abstract imagery...but that was a certain "school," a "movement" in writing. But to say that a songwriter 'just puts a bunch of words down together because they sound good together' just isn't true. That's not a matter of opinion, that's just not what songwriting is all about.  Certain songs may sound that way to you, but those are few and in-between. The majority of songwriters care about their words very deeply, it's their poety, their literature.
 
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jun 2002 Posts: 7,210 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Jun 2002 Posts: 7,210 | 
 formerly known as etaoin...
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jun 2002 Posts: 7,210 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Jun 2002 Posts: 7,210 | 
who made eye contact
 I see what you're sayin'...
 
 
 
 formerly known as etaoin...
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Mar 2000 Posts: 11,613 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Mar 2000 Posts: 11,613 | 
First, I didn't say "all", I said "many".  Second, I said it was my personal opinion.  Third and most importantly, I certainly didn't mean that songs are written with no coherence whatsoever, like the quotes in the fool-the-spam-filter thread.  Fourth, I said "deep meaning".  Q.E.D.:    
 YUMMY YUMMY
 
 Yummy, Yummy, Yummy.
 I got love in my tummy,
 And I feel like a-lovin you:
 Love, you're such a sweet thing,
 Good enough to eat thing
 And that's just a-what I'm gonna do.
 Ooh love, to hold ya,
 Ooh love, to kiss ya,
 Ooh love, I love it so.
 Ooh love, you're sweeter,
 Sweeter than sugar.
 Ooh love, I wont let you go.
 
 Yummy, Yummy, Yummy,
 I got love in my tummy,
 And as silly as it may seem;
 The lovin' that you re giving,
 is what keeps me livin'
 And your love is like
 Peaches and cream.
 Kind-a like sugar,
 Kind-a like spices,
 Kind-a like, like what you do.
 Kind-a sounds funny.
 But love,honey
 Honey. I love you.
 
 Yummy, Yummy, Yummy,
 I. got love in my tummy,
 That your love can satisfy;
 Love, you're such a sweet thing,
 Good enough to eat thing
 And sweet thing, that ain't no lie.
 I love to hold ya,
 Oh love, to kiss ya,
 Ooh love, I love it so.
 Ooh love, you're sweeter,
 Sweeter than sugar.
 Ooh love, I wont let you go.
 
 
 
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Mar 2000 Posts: 1,004 old hand |  
|   old hand Joined:  Mar 2000 Posts: 1,004 | 
Well said Jackie.
 Also, I'm pretty certain I heard somewhere (YCLIU?) that Toto claim their song 'Africa' was written purely for sound - lyrics being chucked in and so on, with no attempt at profundity. America have apparently claimed the same for 'A horse with no name'.
 
 cheer
 
 the sunshine warrior
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jul 2003 Posts: 3,230 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Jul 2003 Posts: 3,230 | 
>that Toto claim their song 'Africa' was written purely for sound - lyrics being chucked in and so on, with no attempt at profundity. And let's (not) forget Duran Duran.   |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Mar 2001 Posts: 4,189 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Mar 2001 Posts: 4,189 | 
First, I didn't say "all", I said "many". Second, I said it was my personal opinion. Third and most importantly, I certainly didn't mean that songs are written with no coherence whatsoever, like the quotes in the fool-the-spam-filter thread. Fourth, I said "deep meaning". Q.E.D.: Yes, Jackie, I realized all the points you made, and thought I made accomodation for them in my rebuttal. But let's not lump "Yummy Yummy" and other fluff bubblegum pop crap with serious songwriting, otherwise you could cite the Archies, "Sugar, Sugar ", The Partridge Family, Bobby Sherman, and on and on...and, BTW, Britney Spears' lyrics are just plain bad , even for that "genre." I had the misfortune of watching them float across the screen in caption at the hospital one night...yeech, I dunno how anyone could attempt to sing that stuff. America , as much as I liked them, were notorious for being weak in the lyric department, and penned what I have always voted as the worst lyric line in the history of rock, from Ventura Highway , "alligator lizards in the air." No drug known to man can make *anything out of that garbage.    And, sure A Horse With No Name  was weird, but it was a *contrived weirdness...if it didn't, at least, *sound like a story, no one would've bought into it at the time. And a song doesn't always have to strive for depth to be good...humor works, too. The storytelling of the true troubadour takes different avenues to hook into the deeper perspectives of life and love. But depth also comes through the fusion of the words and music, too. That's why, say, a love song written by Cole Porter has eons more depth that a love song written by Britney Spears. In short: serious songwriters care about their words. And the craft of songwriting necessitates some meaningful sequential lyric, no matter how light or worthless it may be...even "Yummy Yummy" tells a small story, for what it is. You just can't throw words on music like you can splatter paint over a canvas, it just doesn't work. |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jun 2002 Posts: 1,624 Pooh-Bah |  
|   Pooh-Bah Joined:  Jun 2002 Posts: 1,624 | 
But I think you have to admit that the 1910 Fruitgum Company wasn't striving for anything except chart success.  And in that they were outright winners ... so the song worked.
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Mar 2000 Posts: 11,613 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Mar 2000 Posts: 11,613 | 
 let's not lump "Yummy Yummy" and other fluff bubblegum pop crap with serious songwriting *I* was not doing this.  Yummy Yummy IS a song, is it not?
 Just for the record, it was that specific song I had in mind when I said:  For many other songwriters, and I have to say for artists (painters) too, my personal opinion is that quite often there isn't any "deep" [significant look e] meaning. They just put a bunch of words down that sound good together, because they sound good together.  Q.E.g-dD.
 And just in case you couldn't tell, no, I am NOT in a good mood.
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Mar 2001 Posts: 4,189 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Mar 2001 Posts: 4,189 | 
let's not lump "Yummy Yummy" and other fluff bubblegum pop crap with serious songwriting 
 *I* was not doing this. Yummy Yummy IS a song, is it not?
 Just for the record, it was that specific song I had in mind when I said: For many other songwriters, and I have to say for artists (painters) too, my personal opinion is that quite often there isn't any "deep" [significant look e] meaning. They just put a bunch of words down that sound good together, because they sound good together.
 Jackie, folks who churn out stuff like "Yummy Yummy" aren't really songwriters, and certainly not *artists ....they're merely production machines meeting the market demand. In fact the so-called Archies weren't even really a group, Sugar Sugar  was all a studio con job, the group "The Archies" didn't exist at all. When you say "songwriter" my mind leaps immediately to folks like Leonard Cohen, Bob Dylan, Harry Chapin, Joni Mitchell, John Prine, Cat Stevens, James Taylor, etc...not pop-pabulum. And don't forget, it was Bill Monroe's (the "Father of American Bluegrass" for those who might not know) Blue Moon of Kentucky  that was the catalyst for launching Elvis Presley's career because it was a good  song.   |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jul 2003 Posts: 3,230 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Jul 2003 Posts: 3,230 | 
> folks who churn out stuff like "Yummy Yummy" aren't really songwriters, and certainly not *artists...
 I'm with Jackie on this one, Mr Snob.
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jun 2002 Posts: 7,210 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Jun 2002 Posts: 7,210 | 
ah, yes.  what is art?  
 formerly known as etaoin...
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 13,803 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 13,803 | 
And it's the songs that *seem the least well-crafted that are the best potential fodder for the deconstructionist cash cow.
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jun 2002 Posts: 1,624 Pooh-Bah |  
|   Pooh-Bah Joined:  Jun 2002 Posts: 1,624 | 
The words:
 "We skipped the light fandango
 turned cartwheels cross the floor.
 I was feeling kind of sea sick,
 the crowd called out for more.
 The room was humming harder
 as the ceiling flew away.
 When we called out for another drink
 the waiter brought a tray.
 
 And so it was that later
 as the miller told his tale
 that her face at first just ghostly
 turned a whiter shade of pale.
 
 She said there is no reason
 and the truth is plain to see,
 that I wandered through my playing cards
 would not let her be.
 One of sixteen vestal virgins
 who were leaving for the coast
 and although my eyes were open
 they might just as well been closed.
 
 And so it was that later
 as the miller told his tale
 that her face at first just ghostly
 turned a whiter shade of pale."
 
 This is considered by many critics and others to be one of the most significant rock anthems to come out of the 1960s.   When asked about the words, Keith Reid (who wrote nearly all of Procul Harum's songs) said "It was just a lot of words which sounded good together.  It doesn't mean anything at all".
 
 What, then, is the qualitative difference (to the elitist - Juan) between these words and "Yummy, yummy, yummy, I got love in my tummy"?
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jan 2001 Posts: 428 addict |  
|   addict Joined:  Jan 2001 Posts: 428 | 
Good discussion, all.  One thing I think we have to remember is that the "It was just a lot of words which sounded good together. It doesn't mean anything at all" response from a songwriter isn't necessarily the whole truth.  It may just be that the songwriter doesn't want to get into the personal and nuanced meaning of every line with every reporter in the world.  That's not to say it's not true in all cases, but.
 Second, I think WO'N is working from a different definition of "song" than Jackie in this case.  To WO'N, a "song" is a carefully crafted poem set to music.  "Miss American Pie" is one, "Oops, I Did It Again" is not one.  I don't know what term he might use for it (actually, I know several four-letter ones he might use for it), but it's not in the same league for him.  The interesting thing to me is that Brittney Spears and other Popsters literally DO NOT write their own songs.  They are written, mostly, by professional songwriters.  People like Diane Warren have written dozens of hits sung by pop musicians all over the genrical map, from Meat Loaf and Aerosmith to Brittney and Celine Dion (I just found out she also wrote the theme to "Star Trek: Enterprise"!).  While they may not have the level of soul-searching and integrity that WO'N is looking for, they clearly resonate with several million of our fellow travelers.
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Mar 2001 Posts: 4,189 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Mar 2001 Posts: 4,189 | 
I have absolutely no problem with a song being light and entertaining, as long as it's a good song. I love Jimmy Buffet...he can be deep, A Pirate Looks At Forty, but most of his stuff is light-hearted party music, but it's *good light-hearted music. I don't wallow in elitism when it comes to music of any genre...my simple criterium is "is it a good song?"  There's good music and there's bad music, of any kind. You don't have to like country music, and, many of us here, I know, loathe it, but in its own context there are good country songs and bad country songs. Old time Tin Pan Alley songs were production house stuff, but a lot of them are fun and hold up to this day. Loudon Wainwright III's Dead Skunk is a frivolous humor piece, but it's a great song. Pop music, too, from Al Jolson to just before the present scene, always seemed to produce some listenable and memorable stuff. In fact, most of the past icons from Elvis to the Beatles and on to Michael Jackson and Madonna (who worked with good writers) produced, at least, a couple songs, that were familiar to just about everyone of all ages, even if you didn't follow them or, indeed, disdained of them, some of their songs you just couldn't escape.  In contrast, Britney Spears, supposedly an icon as big as any of these, doesn't have *one song I, or anyone I know of any age, can readily identify by the music or words. I know radio formatting is more specialized these days, but someone that *big should have one or two stand-out signature tunes that almost eveyrone knows (like Madonna's "Like A Virgin", for instance)...the same for the boy-band icons. Because the music and writing is just bad, bad, bad, even for light entertaining pop music.
 And I like good country music, a genre vehemently disdained by a few on this board, so how can I be an elitist?
 
 A Whiter Shade of Pale (Procul Harem), Cap, was a good song...the reason you're citing it now, the reason it has survived. So, for whatever reason, the words worked.
 
 I've been involved with many songwriting groups, and currently attend a weekly workshop and songshare, and *most songwriters work *hard on their craft and art, they don't just throw words at music.
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Mar 2001 Posts: 4,189 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Mar 2001 Posts: 4,189 | 
Mr Snob.Huh? So whattiya think of country music, Mr. Openess?   |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Mar 2000 Posts: 11,613 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Mar 2000 Posts: 11,613 | 
Who or what is Phlebas, please?  Excellent points, Flatlander; and, your post illustrates eta's, and something I was trying to say way back:  what is art, indeed, and who gets to decide?  :-)  Some people look at a painting of a big red dot and see all kinds of meanings in it;  I'm afraid I would see 'a big ol' red dot' and nothing more. Back in about 1970 I bought a paperback called "The Poetry of Rock", and just loved it.  Came across it some years later, and tossed it.   I wonder if audiences who loved songs such as  "Some Enchanted Evening" and "Don't Fence Me In"--and the writers of these songs--thought songs such as "Don't Sit Under the Apple Tree" and "Boogie Woogie Bugle Boy" were trash songs?
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jun 2002 Posts: 7,210 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Jun 2002 Posts: 7,210 | 
I found this at WikiPedia:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consider_PhlebasFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 
 Consider Phlebas (ISBN 1857231384) is a science fiction book by Iain M. Banks first published in 1987. It is Banks' first science fiction novel, set in The Culture, and takes its title from a line in T. S. Eliot's poem The Waste Land; Look to Windward could be considered a follow up because of both the storyline and the fact that both titles are from that poem.
 
 The novel revolves around the Idiran-Culture War, and Banks plays on that theme by presenting various microcosms of that conflict.
 read here, for more on The Culture ...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture 
 formerly known as etaoin...
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 13,803 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 13,803 | 
And then some of us have been finding poetry in spam email subject lines, the sole purpose of which is to get past spam filters.  I'm sticking with 'just because you wrote it…'
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jun 2002 Posts: 7,210 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Jun 2002 Posts: 7,210 | 
I porbably ought to start a new thread just for this "Culture" stuff, but, oh well... from Iain Banks description of Marain:...enables the Culture Minds fully to indulge their seemingly congenital predilection of unnecessary obfuscation, wilful contrariness and the fluent generation of utter and profound confusion in others.  http://homepages.compuserve.de/Mostral/artikel/marain.html 
 formerly known as etaoin...
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Mar 2000 Posts: 6,511 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Mar 2000 Posts: 6,511 |  |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jan 2004 Posts: 1,475 veteran |  
|   veteran Joined:  Jan 2004 Posts: 1,475 | 
The great thing about language is that if you put two or three words together, people will try to understand what it is you intended to mean. It's why Chomsky had such a tough time finding ungrammatical sentences. Even "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously" has some kind of meaning for some people. This human urge has led to a whole branch of philosophy called hermeneutics. Named after Hermes, the patron god of merchants, thieves, linguists, and bible exegetes. You gonna tell me that the poem Fleas "Adam / Had 'em." ain't high art? For shame. I'll go back to my roots and verbs now.
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jan 2004 Posts: 1,475 veteran |  
|   veteran Joined:  Jan 2004 Posts: 1,475 | 
Some people look at a painting of a big red dot and see all kinds of meanings in it; I'm afraid I would see 'a big ol' red dot' and nothing more.
 I know what you mean. It has to be a really good, big ol' red dot, for me to really like.
 
 The last time I visited the Louvre I marvelled at all the folks elbowing each other out of the way to look at La Gioconda behind all its security. They were not looking at a piece of art. It was something else. As I pondered this, I notice that I was standing by myself in another room in the museum with my back to a smallish painting. I looked at it and it was a Vermeer. Now that was art. Being ignored by the plebes (consider ye whom?). But seriously, I never understood why folks genuinely liked Rothkos and Pollacks until I saw them up close and personal rather than in small pictures in some Time-Life series of art books. There was something there that I really liked, and in the end that's all that matters. It wasn't representational or maudlin, but it was art.
 
 I think that art is a contract between the artist and her/his audience. The artist chooses something to show us, and we enjoy it or we don't. But like most tastes, it's hard to share this feeling that a work of art causes us to have. A lot of people complain about difficult works of art, say a film, and how they just want to be entertained. Well, I was entertained not by one piece of moderate genre art (i.e., the Mona Lisa), but rather by the crowds fighting over a glimpse of it. Does "meaning" in art mean a paratext that explains the art? Or is the emotional state it evokes in the viewer?
 
 I think one of the gravest sins that modern academics have done in the eyes of J Q Public is to attempt to come to terms with popular art / culture using the same apparatus they developed for critiquing "serious" art.
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 2,661 Carpal Tunnel |  
|   Carpal Tunnel Joined:  Dec 2000 Posts: 2,661 | 
...the same apparatus they developed for critiquing "serious" art.
 "serious" only because of that apparatus.
 
 
 
 |  |  |  
 | 
 |