Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#116681 11/26/03 10:58 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
I just heard this on NPR; the following is a link to the Reuters story. The full story is supposed to come out by the end of the week in the science journal Nature. Just thought I'd set this up before I forget:

http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=3897531


#116682 11/26/03 11:16 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 81
J
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
J
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 81
That doesn't say much. There's a little bit more at the Nature site: http://www.nature.com/nsu/031124/031124-6.html

But it's still just glottochronology, which has been tried a million times before, and is known to be vastly inaccurate for absolute dating. So we need to see the article to see what new claim they're making about being able to date it.


#116683 11/26/03 11:18 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
Thank you, Jenet. I realize it didn't say much. I just wanted to post the subject before I leave for the holiday, and we linguist types can wrestle it to the ground later.


#116684 12/03/03 03:08 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
I have to remember to buy the brick-and-mortar magazine. The web site piece is pretty choppy, as it were.


#116685 12/03/03 08:51 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 81
J
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
J
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 81
The Yahoo group Cybalist have the article as a PDF (it's only about four pages) in their members-only section. I've now read it and am blinded with statistical science: I have no idea what any of their fancy new tests mean. (I know what "bayesian" means, vaguely.)

But the basic point is they're not claiming to do anything other than glottochronology: they're just applying new statistically subtle tests to overcome the traditional objections that made glottochronology worthless. These were things like evolution happening at different rates on different branches; and borrowing between related branches fuzzying up the tree structure.

They tried all sorts of assumptions, and then tried varying them to see what effect they had. Words identifiable or questionable as borrowings would be included in some runs, excluded in others, or just marked as doubtful.

After huge numbers of comparative runs like this they found the tree was mostly pretty stable. The main difference was in the age of the base, down near where Hittite split off from the rest.

For what it's worth, here are the branching dates they came up with on their best tree:

Celtic into P and Q: 2900 years ago
Latin into Sardinian and the rest: 1700
Germanic into North and West: 1750

They then group Germanic with Italic, splitting 5500 BP, and that close to Celtic, splitting 6100 BP.

Slavonic into South and North: 1300
Balto-Slavic into Baltic and Slavonic: 5500

Sanskrit into Kashmiri and the other Prakrits: 2900
Iranian: 2500
Indo-Iranian into Indic and Iranian: 4600

Albanian dialects: 600
They group Albanian closest to Indo-Iranian, but still very distant (no date given), then group Balto-Slavic with Celto-Italo-Germanic 6500 and all the above 6900. This is a big fanning out in a short term, so they suggest this is consistent with the Kurgan theory: it is this division that was the Kurgan one. The only branches that appear older than that are Greek and Armenian, which they group together, splitting from the others at 7300 BP.

Earlier than this, Tocharian at 7900. Finally, Hittite unites with the rest of the tree at 8700. These dates are the most variable.

Well, I hope that makes some sense. This is just my lay interpretation! Don't judge their statistics on my poor reports.



#116686 12/03/03 08:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Boy, howdy, Jenet. Have to draw that all out. Was that 600BP on the Albanian? Seems awful recent. Just checking, mind.


#116687 12/03/03 11:52 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
my glotto's on the fritz...



formerly known as etaoin...
#116688 12/04/03 07:48 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 81
J
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
J
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 81
I'm not sure what the Albanian result means: they have Albanian T, G, Top, K, and C, which I'm guessing are modern dialects, dating their split back to 600 BP.

For Greek they have Greek ML, MD, Mod, D, and K, and date the split to 800 BP. They didn't use any ancient languages other than Hittite and Tocharian, so I'm guessing these results must all refer to the modern dialects.

Some of the names have notations ST or List after them. (Where do they explain these?) Possibly Standard and Literary Standard.


#116689 12/04/03 01:14 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Ahh. I had interpreted it as saying Albanian split off (from something else) 600BP. My bad.


#116690 12/06/03 02:53 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
B
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Interview on BBC Radio 4 about tracing back languages to Neolithic farmers and possible links to genetics: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/thematerialworld_20031127.shtml

Bingley


Bingley
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,580
Members9,187
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Karin, JeffMackwood, artguitar, Jim_W, Rdbuffalo
9,187 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 332 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,713
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,931
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5