In reply to:
"Indeed, the Court's reading of the plain language of the Fourth Amendment is incapable of explaining even its own holding in this case."
...and, Bingley, this sentence is quite different from the one we've been examining in that the antecedent for its is unclear. Generally antecedents should appear in proximity to the pronoun. In the sentence you cite above, its is closest in position to Fourth Amendment, and that fact automatically makes the sentence incorrect because we can figure out that its actually refers to the Court--even without considering the rule you've provided.
However, in the sentence we've been examining it is clear that Toni Morrison is the referent for her. There is no problem with the position of her. But thanks for providing a clear citation of the rule. I think there is a problem with a categorical application of this particular rule.
