Allo Ted,

Being from Canada I have no opinion whatsoever as to who is a better candidate but I deduce by your comment that you back Mr. Gore since he is the one who called Mr. Bush to concede and you are saying that a concession is meaningless.

But WHY is a concession meaningless? Maybe I misunderstand the term, or the concept. Why would Gore have bothered to concede if it meant nothing and was a worthless statement?

The way it looks now, to people removed from the situation, is that Gore is wishy-washy and does not stick to his word.