|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,289
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,289 |
In reply to:
honour, etc.
I don't think I want to go there, as that horse has been, I believe sufficiently flogged. For the record, I acknowledge the High Church, or Johnsonian spelling scheme along with the Low Church, or Noah Webster, scheme. There are these caveats, however: 1. English spelling has always been a mess, since the first woad-painted scribes picked up a seashell fragment, or whatever it was. 2. Dictionaries may prescribe spellings, but they are not official, since we have no equivalent of the French Academie. (and no one would pay any attention to it if we did.) 3. Current preferred spellings have been instilled into generations of scholars by the likes of schoolmasters with their canes impressing the minds (if not the bums) of their hapless charges, as well as the old maids who were the only primary-school teachers until recently in this country (USA). Neither of these classes are descended from the Cumean Sibyl. 4. Hence, I have to conclude that each individual's English spelling is either a matter of habit or of choice, like said Morning Prayer vs. Solemn Choral Eucharist. I suppose that if I moved to the UK, I'd have to learn to spell Englilsh style, ; I believe the Brits who come here learn our spelling.
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
your, you're
|
D.Loaring
|
11/13/00 02:56 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
Jackie
|
11/13/00 04:29 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
of troy
|
11/13/00 04:35 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
D.Loaring
|
11/14/00 01:21 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
FishonaBike
|
11/14/00 04:00 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
tsuwm
|
11/14/00 04:24 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
maverick
|
11/14/00 04:57 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
FishonaBike
|
11/15/00 04:44 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
maverick
|
11/15/00 04:52 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
FishonaBike
|
11/15/00 05:09 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
RhubarbCommando
|
11/17/00 08:35 AM
|
Re: your, you're
|
maverick
|
11/17/00 12:17 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
RhubarbCommando
|
11/17/00 03:10 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
maverick
|
11/17/00 04:34 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
RhubarbCommando
|
11/22/00 11:41 AM
|
Re: your, you're
|
lusy
|
11/24/00 07:34 AM
|
Re: your, you're
|
Bobyoungbalt
|
12/12/00 04:22 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
tsuwm
|
12/12/00 04:30 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
RhubarbCommando
|
12/12/00 04:33 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
maverick
|
12/12/00 04:37 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
Capital Kiwi
|
12/12/00 05:05 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
Bobyoungbalt
|
12/12/00 05:44 PM
|
British spelling
|
TEd Remington
|
12/12/00 06:42 PM
|
Re: British spelling
|
Max Quordlepleen
|
12/12/00 06:50 PM
|
In defence of "defense"
|
Capital Kiwi
|
12/13/00 12:01 AM
|
in defence of "defense"
|
RhubarbCommando
|
12/13/00 09:50 AM
|
Re: in defence of "defense"
|
Capital Kiwi
|
12/13/00 04:24 PM
|
Re: in defence of "defense"
|
maverick
|
12/13/00 05:19 PM
|
Re: in defence of "defense"
|
of troy
|
12/13/00 05:35 PM
|
Re: in defence of "defense"
|
Capital Kiwi
|
12/13/00 08:46 PM
|
Re: in defence of "defense"
|
Capital Kiwi
|
12/13/00 08:48 PM
|
Owed to Spell Checker
|
Marty
|
12/13/00 09:06 PM
|
Re: Owed to Spell Checker
|
Capital Kiwi
|
12/13/00 09:25 PM
|
Re: Owed to Spell Checker
|
Faldage
|
12/13/00 09:45 PM
|
Re: Owed to Spell Checker: Part II
|
Faldage
|
12/13/00 09:50 PM
|
Re: Owed to Spell Checker: Part II
|
belMarduk
|
12/13/00 11:00 PM
|
Re: Owed to Spell Checker: Part II
|
Capital Kiwi
|
12/14/00 12:40 AM
|
Re: Owed to Spell Checker: Part II
|
Faldage
|
12/14/00 02:06 PM
|
Re: Owed to Spell Checker: Part II
|
satin
|
02/28/01 06:30 PM
|
Re: Owed to Spell Checker: Part II
|
Anonymous
|
02/28/01 06:34 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
FishonaBike
|
11/15/00 04:55 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
Max Quordlepleen
|
11/14/00 06:34 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
Max Quordlepleen
|
11/14/00 06:41 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
Jackie
|
11/15/00 01:50 AM
|
Commas
|
Marty
|
11/15/00 02:02 AM
|
Re: your, you're
|
Max Quordlepleen
|
11/15/00 04:37 AM
|
Re: your, you're
|
maverick
|
11/15/00 12:15 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
tsuwm
|
11/15/00 03:07 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
maverick
|
11/15/00 03:12 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
wow
|
11/26/00 01:17 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
Max Quordlepleen
|
11/26/00 06:46 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
Jackie
|
11/26/00 06:51 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
Max Quordlepleen
|
11/26/00 07:09 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
Jackie
|
11/27/00 02:34 AM
|
Re: your, you're
|
AnnaStrophic
|
11/27/00 02:43 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
wow
|
11/26/00 07:02 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
jmh
|
12/06/00 12:02 PM
|
Saw a louse chase a mouse
|
Faldage
|
12/06/00 07:36 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
AnnaStrophic
|
11/14/00 04:54 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
AnnaStrophic
|
11/14/00 05:07 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
Elion
|
12/05/00 01:53 AM
|
Re: your, you're
|
tsuwm
|
12/05/00 01:43 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
Capital Kiwi
|
12/05/00 05:04 PM
|
Re: your, you're
|
Elion
|
12/05/00 07:16 PM
|
change
|
wsieber
|
12/06/00 07:37 AM
|
Re: "corrections"
|
jmh
|
12/06/00 11:53 AM
|
Mea culpa
|
shanks
|
12/06/00 12:28 PM
|
Re: Mea culpa
|
Faldage
|
12/06/00 07:47 PM
|
Re: Mea culpa
|
jmh
|
12/07/00 12:00 AM
|
Re: Loose & lose
|
RhubarbCommando
|
12/07/00 10:40 AM
|
Re: "corrections"
|
Max Quordlepleen
|
12/06/00 09:29 PM
|
oops
|
Elion
|
12/07/00 10:30 PM
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,915
Posts229,916
Members9,197
|
Most Online3,341 Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
1 members (wofahulicodoc),
746
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|