|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 742
old hand
|
|
old hand
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 742 |
Yesterday, I went to my local hospital's physio department to enquire about buying a walking stick. I asked if the ones they sold were telescopic, and was told, "no, you push a button to pull it out or in, making it shorter or longer." Was my inward smirking justified, or was I being unduly harsh in my assessment of that response?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858 |
Dear sjm: It used to be fairly common to have a sword hidden in a walking stick. Maybe a
walking stick could have a telescope built into it. Great for spying on the neighbors, or
lovers' lane.
I can see merit in a collapsing, extensible walking stick only if no weight were going to be
put on it. Get a solid one, and make your batman carry it for you until you need it.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 618
addict
|
|
addict
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 618 |
ICBB looking up the "correct" definition of telescopic, but I feel the need to add MHO.
Most people would understand telescopic (as used) to describe ... something akin in appearance to a stereotypical mariner's telescope. That is, possessing the physical property of lengthening and shortening by intussusception (for want of a better, less medical word). The small bit goes inside a bigger bit, repeatedly. To me, asking if a walking stick was telescopic means you have the desire to collapse it down and store it in a bag, briefcase, or other area of limited space. Which unto itself is quite a nice idea but would probably interfere with the reliability of the stick, unless you were willing to fork out the big bucks. If this is what you were after then the response is perfectly valid. Many walking sticks are adjustable, with different length options, depending on patient size and comfort. If this property was the issue of your enquiry then, IMHO, using telescopic to mean merely adjustable is somewhat obfuscating.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 742
old hand
|
|
old hand
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 742 |
>If this property was the issue of your enquiry then, IMHO, using telescopic to mean merely adjustable is somewhat obfuscating.
That's what I was after, thanks, although M-W does suggest that my use of the word was at least not incorrect.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065 |
I have heard of walking sticks being made out of bull's penises, but they're not that long, surely?
Bingley
Bingley
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296 |
For the record:
Quick definitions (intussusception)
noun: (biology) growth in the surface area of a cell by the deposit of new particles between existing particles in the cell wall
noun: the folding in of an outer layer so as to form a pocket in the surface~Onelook.com
...just in case anybody would like to keep that word tucked away in case you ever need it for 'want of' another word.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 555
addict
|
|
addict
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 555 |
Clinically, WW, it is one portion of the intestine telescoping into the adjacent part and causing an obstruction. (Tube into tube). OH dear, am in a dreadful hurry. Shll come back here to clarify if someone else does not by then.
Edit: This post now, seems self explanatory. I might be restating the obvious by explaining further. FWIW, An intussusception is an acute abdominal condition wherein one length of the intestine folds in of itself and telescopes (collapses into/ gets sucked into)into the adjacent normal part. In the process, both obstruction and strangulation occur. Common in small children.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 508
addict
|
|
addict
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 508 |
Re: your first link, WO'N - Clicking on it produced a message saying, "REMOTE LINKING FORBIDDEN/ This host does not support remote linking of images or files for FREE accounts/ PLEASE UPGRADE YOUR ACCOUNT."
Huh? What/whose account?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189 |
Hmmm...innerstin' Nancy. Must be a time lapse copyright protection. Lots of copyrighted text sites have no-copy code written into them, now, too. Lemme see if I can copy it off the Google image.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210 |
both links work fine for me, WO'N.
formerly known as etaoin...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189 |
both links work fine for me, WO'N.
Yeahbutİ, I'm gettin' the same message as Nancy on the former link, now, too, eta...and it's there now when I click over to the image from the Google link, too???
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210 |
strange. you might try copy/pasting the url instead of clicking on it; sometimes that works.
Nancy, the account in question is the person who runs that site, not yours. some free(or cheap) web-hosts don't allow pictures to be displayed from a remote link.
formerly known as etaoin...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189 |
>strange< Yeah, eta, the first link is back now...when I tried it after Nancy's post before I got the blocked message then. What's with all these haunted pixels all of a sudden? Disappearing plus signs, disappearing subject lines, refused links??? Do we have a new resident polteregeist here, or what? 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210 |
is back now...when I tried it after Nancy's post before I got the blocked message then. well, it may be because somebody's been playing with the time machine again... 
formerly known as etaoin...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613 |
somebody's been playing with the time machine again...
Well now, eta, you wouldn't have any idea about who that might be, now, wouldja, hmm?
|
|
|
|
|
