Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#9912 11/12/2000 4:32 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Ah, Metameta, I am so pleased to see that the hook is set.

You posit a false dichotomy, which baits the trap in which you find yourself ensnared. The answers to your questions are "both/and."

The key to all of this was discovered and set down by the Anglican Divine Richard Hooker in the late 16th Century. See his "Of the lawes of ecclesiasticall politie" in its complete Folger Library edition. Hooker explained that the source of all truth is located in the confluence of scripture, tradition and reason.

The "scripture" in the instant case is the works of Saint William Shakespeare, of Saint Thomas Cranmer and of the other giants of our language.

The "tradition" is in the interpretation of the sacred deposit laid down by such inspired souls as Saint H.W. Fowler, Saint E.B. White, Saint Edwin Newman and Saint William F. Buckley Jr. (on matters of language, not politics).

The "reason" is that which one brings to the dance. As the language evolves, one may participate in the process by drawing on the sacred writ, understanding the commentary thereon and then applying wit to find a defensible place in the muddle.

Dogma? Yes.
Inspiration? Yes.
Knowledge? Yes.
Method? Yes.

I remain at your service.


#9913 11/12/2000 8:53 AM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 724
Avy Offline
old hand
old hand
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 724
Side thought: Does a poster post posts?

A poster posts posts post posting posts.

I am sure a longer sentence is possible - anyone?


#9914 11/12/2000 10:27 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 460
addict
addict
Offline
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 460
Hi Avy:

I'm not sure about the number of successive 'posts' you can manage, but I still remember from my schooldays a sentence composed of a word used ten times in succession.

I'll hold off posting the example to allow you all some thinking time.


#9915 11/12/2000 10:34 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 460
addict
addict
Offline
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 460
Me again.

I just re-counted and it's eleven not ten in succession.

That should make it easier for you!


#9916 11/12/2000 11:29 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
paulb--

Is it the exact same form of the word? No endings added?


#9917 11/12/2000 3:20 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4
stranger
stranger
Offline
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4
According to Origins, by Eric Partridge:
orient, the east, has late MF-F derivative orienter, whence 'to orient", whence, in part, "to orientate" and, prob after F, orientation; F orienter has the EF-F cpd desorienter. whence "to disorient", largely superseded by "to disorientate", whence disorienattion; hence, anl, "to reorient", now usu reorienatte, whence, anl, reorientation.

Is this any help, or just confusing?


#9918 11/12/2000 6:13 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 29
newbie
newbie
Offline
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 29
There is an old chestnut with 14 instances of the same word, all in succession. It involves two proper nouns, one of which is a little "iffy".
Is iffy an acceptable word, or should I place it in quotes to indicate its "iffy" status?
Thanks,
MM


#9919 11/12/2000 6:16 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 29
newbie
newbie
Offline
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 29
A poster poster posts posts post posting posters.

Ach, I'm not sure I should be having this much fun on a Sunday morning--eh, Father?


#9920 11/12/2000 9:02 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 29
newbie
newbie
Offline
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 29
I'm new to this, and it's taking all my orienteering skills to find my way around, but I'm fascinated by the responses. I prefer disoriented to disorientated, if only for the brevity, which seems like a reasonable argument since it appears to have become a toss up between the two.

BTW Would disorienteering be akin to lying on the couch with one's eyes closed?

David

Carpe rutila


Carpe whatever
#9921 11/12/2000 9:20 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 347
enthusiast
enthusiast
Offline
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 347
...I still remember from my schooldays a sentence composed of a word used ten times in succession ... I just re-counted and it's eleven not ten in succession.

Funny you should mention this, paulb. This week my daughter showed me her school newsletter with the following item in the Fun/Jokes section for the kids.

A signwriter had just finished painting the sign FISH AND CHIPS on a shop when the owner came out and complained "There's too much space between FISH and AND and AND and CHIPS."

I then introduced what I presume is the same example as yours, which I too recall from my school days.

Am I on the right track if I say it's a 3-letter word, some in quotes, and technically it's two sentences, or at least two distinct thoughts connected by a semi-colon? No proper nouns, and no iffy word usage.


#9922 11/13/2000 12:56 AM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 724
Avy Offline
old hand
old hand
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 724
>..I still remember from my schooldays a sentence composed of a word used ten
>times in succession ..

Paul: I think it is one of those puzzles that one knows if one knows it (what is happening to me - Deolali?) - but I think the sentence will be of a word that can be a noun - subject and object, verb, adverb and adjective. Maybe the answer is in finding out which word can be all the parts of the speech.

Meta: "Post posters' posts, a poster posts posts, post posting posts".



#9923 11/13/2000 8:06 AM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 31
newbie
newbie
Offline
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 31
I agree. And the convergence of art and science is the new metaphysics.


#9924 11/13/2000 12:51 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
disorienteering be akin to lying on the couch with one's eyes closed?

That conjures up a lovely vision - and I had thought it meant be unkind about practitioners of this noble hunt! Welcome, oh rastellfarian one. (Warning, everyone, it's another bicycle...)


#9925 11/13/2000 4:42 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
All right, what's a rastellfarian?


#9926 11/16/2000 10:28 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 460
addict
addict
Offline
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 460
Goodness, I waited a couple of days and already the thread has lost its currency! So here's the sentence with the same eleven words in succession:

If only she, who had had "had", had had "had had"; "had had" had had the teacher's approval.




#9927 11/16/2000 12:00 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
old hand
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
how easily prejudices can evolve
Fortunately! A prejudice that has evolved is no longer a prejudice but tends to mutate into an accepted truth..


#9928 11/16/2000 3:25 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 29
newbie
newbie
Offline
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 29
Retract that statement immediately, wsieber! I won't have it! I'm putting my hands over my ears now and singing real loud...LA LALA LALA LA LALA.... :)
My "had" riddle supposes two people, one named "Had" (an uncommon but known first name), the other named "Had-Had" (a stretch), and goes like this:
had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had would have recieved a higher mark.
The problem is to insert punctuation which would make this a real sentence.
Prejudice evolving into accepted truths? I won't have it! Makes me feel like I should take up arms.
MM


#9929 11/16/2000 7:29 PM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409
Carpal Tunnel
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409
In reply to:

A prejudice that has evolved is no longer a prejudice but tends to mutate into an accepted truth..


¡¿Qué?! Please clarify this satement, wsieber. I am certain you did not mean it to be so, but it reminds me very much of the statement variously attributed to Göbbels or to his boss, "tell a big enough lie often enough, and most people will believe it."


#9930 11/17/2000 8:33 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
old hand
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
Retract that statement
Ok, it seems I threw the cat into the goldfish pond.
The combination of prejudice with evolve provoked me to that statement. Prejudices, I think, are characterized by the very fact that they don't evolve but stay fixed in the face of evidence. Uncomfortable discoveries, on the other hand are often for a long time discredited as "prejudices" - example? The BSE story.


#9931 11/18/2000 2:58 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 29
newbie
newbie
Offline
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 29
Evolving prejudices is kind of an odd image. I suppose I meant the way prejudices can begin as a fleeting perception, a nuance, and before you know it they've become an idea, one that I am willing to defend or make judgements about when, in fact, I know next to nothing about the facts. Common, common.
Of images, the cat in the goldfish pond is hilarious! I mean, poor kitty, but what a great saying!


#9932 11/20/2000 4:42 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
veteran
veteran
Offline
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
the cat in the goldfish pond... poor kitty

He had it coming, you mark my words.


It was great - the fish didn't need feeding for ages.



Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2025 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0