Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith.org Forums General Topics Miscellany The Sword in the Stone?
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
OP Funny thing. So for years I've been meaning to look up what certain math terms mean etymologically - and recently I've been doing this on occasion. It's just for fun and I'm not being systematic about it.
Anyway, I was looking up the word "set" and it pointed to this Latin word "secta" and I thought, "Hey, that sounds like section," so I looked up section.
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=Soap-rock
and while I never quite understand what these entries are telling me, section is somehow related to an OE word seax which means a short sword, but it looks like it derives from the Latin saxum which means stone.
Makes sense to me. The PIE root means 'to cut' and the English seax became the thing doing the cutting and the Latin saxum the thing being cut (or, in this case, carved).
and while I never quite understand what these entries are telling me, section is somehow related to an OE word seax which means a short sword, but it looks like it derives from the Latin saxum which means stone.
Etymologies, especially the ones in dictionary entries, are greatly compressed histories of related words (and languages). The entry you were referring to (not to mantle Faldo's toes):Posits a PIE root (base) *sek- 'to cut' from which are descended many cognate words in various daughter languages. Latin has two words: (1) seco, secare, sectus, 'to cut' (which has an abstract noun sectio from the past passive participle sectus and (2) a noun saxum meaning 'stone'. The noun saxum is not a descendant of seco, they are more like siblings or cousins, both of which descend from the PIE base. Same thing in Old English, except in that case, there are three nouns, i.e., sigše 'scythe' secg 'sword' and seax 'knife, short sword'. The great thing about language is that you can take words or roots (bases) and by using affixes and other morphological processes derive whole families of semantically related words to use.Quote:1550s, from M.Fr. section, from L. sectionem (nom. sectio) "a cutting, cutting off, division," from sectus, pp. of secare "to cut," from PIE base *sek- "cut" (cf. O.C.S. seko, sesti "to cut," secivo "ax, hatchet;" Lith. isekti "to engrave, carve;" Alb. sate "mattock;" O.S. segasna, O.E. sigše "scythe;" O.E. secg "sword," seax "knife, short sword;" O.Ir. doescim "I cut;" L. saxum "rock, stone").
Ceci n'est pas un seing.
No mantle taken, Nuncle.
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics Forums16Topics13,915Posts229,892Members9,197 Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members Bill_L, achz, MAGNVSTALSMA, Burlyfish, Renegade98
9,197 Registered Users
Who's Online Now 0 members (), 365 guests, and 1 robot. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days) A C Bowden 29
Top Posters wwh 13,858Faldage 13,803Jackie 11,613wofahulicodoc 10,893tsuwm 10,542LukeJavan8 9,947Buffalo Shrdlu 7,210AnnaStrophic 6,511Wordwind 6,296of troy 5,400
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith.org