|
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4 |
Based on this week's theme--terms related to royalty--the post for morganatic does not seem to fit. There is no connection to royalty made in the etymology or the usage example. (Marriage between classes more often does not imply royalty + commoner, IMHO.) If in fact is related, can anyone explain how?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,819
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,819 |
I guess it depends on how strictly you expect the theme to be applied. It isn't exactly a huge stretch.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 557
addict
|
addict
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 557 |
The definition says "...the spouse of lower rank and the children do not share the titles...". I'd say titles is the operative word linking to nobility. Offhand I can't think of any non-noble titles which might pass to children (or spouses) via marriage.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154 |
A morganatic marriage was one option considered as a solution to the Wallis Simpson affair.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,580
Members9,187
|
Most Online3,341 Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
0 members (),
332
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|