Sorry, can't answer your question, but I can say that she was a member of a family that I was considerably less than impressed with, in my readings by and about Rupert Brooke.
I know that the Bloomsbury people were not the whole world, but: mercy, I don't think it says very much good about society when it not only permits but actively encourages (through laudatory accolades if nothing else) a bunch of people to do nothing but focus on themselves and their innermost thoughts, philosophies, etc.

(Sorry for the redundancy, but I couldn't think of a way to make laudatory a noun, and accolade alone wasn't as strong as I wanted to declare.)