>>[My] assertion of what he may or may not think has no grounding in what he actually [posted].

. . . and yet, I can't help but think -- and damn it all, I may be wrong -- that tsuwm was actually targeting certain tendenciencies on this board and how they may sometimes veer away from its original and continuing purpose. Given Fish's perhaps hyperbolic description of the content of 'content' as well as the fact that his examples by allusion are the *rehash of, yes, important issues, I take it the lead post in this thread was a mild, and humorous, critique. Let him who knows speak or remain silent.