|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 167
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 167 |
From a recent-ish legal judgment in Oz:
<<It will be noted that we have called the respondent a "confectionery" wholesaler and the product "confectionary". According to the third edition of the Macquarie Dictionary, "confectionary" is "a confection or sweet", while "confectionery" means "confections or sweets collectively". The Oxford English Dictionary defines "confectionary" as "a confectionary preparation, a sweetmeat" and "confectionery" as "things made or sold by a confectioner; a collective name for sweetmeats and confections". Thus a single confection is "confectionary" and a variety of different sweets "confectionery". These definitions do not necessarily determine the choice of word in the present case, which involves many sweets, though all of the same type. However the examples of usage given in the Oxford English Dictionary throw some light on the matter. Thus in 1844 one sees - "ever and anon she insisted upon his taking some particular confectionary, because it was a favourite of hers". And in 1791 one finds - "he pressed her to partake of a variety of confectioneries". The contrast provided by these examples suggests that "confectionary" should be used when describing many sweets, all of which are the same. Hence the spelling we have adopted of "confectionery" and "confectionary".>>
Comments?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692 |
What on earth was the judgement dealing with that made such a detailed examination/explanation of these words essential? Or were they being paid by the hour?
dxb
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 |
paid by the hour
Or by the word. The OED, however, is relatively clear and is correctly quoted. There are other definitions for each word..
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400 |
the food inspector from monty pythons skit about the candies finally made it to court.. you remember "crunchy frog" chocolates, and all the other wonderful selections, don't you?
Crunchy frog with small tree frogs, delicately washed in pure spring water before being wrapped in chocolate? (they weren't cooked or boned, in fact it was the tiny little frog bones that made them crunchy!)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,146
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,146 |
Albatross! Albatross! Get yours here! Albatross!
The idiot also known as Capfka ...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
veteran
|
|
veteran
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346 |
"crunchy frog" chocolates, and all the other wonderful selectionsVoila: http://www.ibras.dk/montypython/episode06.htm#5Although the best rendition was as an ad in one of the Monty Python books - the Papperbok, I think (as opposed to the Big Red Book, which was, of course, blue). Anyone here have a copy of either of those books?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,204
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,204 |
helen, I think you ought to delete this before hyla reads it! 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,981
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,981 |
Anyone here have a copy of either of those books?
Yep, both
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,334
Members9,182
| |
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
|
1 members (1 invisible),
723
guests, and
1
robot. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
