#80948 - 09/17/02 11:46 AM
"Like" earns linguistic validation
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 03/13/01
Posts: 4189
Loc: Rio Grande, Cape May County, N...
|
A Temple University linguistics professor has just issued a treatise on the floating "like" so familiar to us all, like. And her study, like, grants "like" linguistic validity, like, as a discourse particle (the evolution of language marches on...): http://www.jsonline.com/enter/gen/sep02/71334.asp
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#80949 - 09/17/02 12:23 PM
Re: "Like" earns linguistic validation
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 01/05/01
Posts: 1814
Loc: Spam Factory
|
Interesting link. It's a must-read for all those people who are, like, "Language rules are prescriptive and not descriptive."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#80950 - 09/17/02 05:33 PM
Re: "Like" earns linguistic validation
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 11/13/00
Posts: 3146
Loc: Northamptonshire, England
|
I dunno. "Um" seems, somehow, more evocative ...
_________________________
The idiot also known as Capfka ...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#80951 - 09/17/02 06:16 PM
Re: "Like" earns linguistic validation
|
veteran
Registered: 10/11/00
Posts: 1346
Loc: Sussex, England
|
"Um" seems, somehow, more evocative ...
Yes. And rounded and, ummm, expressive.
Ah, and it pairs up very nicely with, um, well, "ah" actually.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#80952 - 09/17/02 08:36 PM
Re: "Like" earns linguistic validation
|
member
Registered: 07/05/00
Posts: 167
Loc: Australia
|
What's wrong with like, um both of them? jj
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#80953 - 09/17/02 10:06 PM
Re: "Like" earns linguistic validation
|
enthusiast
Registered: 01/29/02
Posts: 320
Loc: Sarasota, Florida, US
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#80954 - 09/17/02 10:40 PM
Re: "Like" earns linguistic validation
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 03/13/01
Posts: 4189
Loc: Rio Grande, Cape May County, N...
|
Y'know, um, all you guys, like, I put this in Q&A because, um, I really wanted some, like, serious discourse on this subject. Like, sheesh! [rolleyes-e]
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#80955 - 09/18/02 03:05 AM
Re: "Like" earns linguistic validation
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 03/22/00
Posts: 1981
|
Re: Serious discussion
Is there a difference between Liverpudlian "like" as demonstrated by the Beatles in their day, like, and heard by me, at least, with a distinctly Liverpudlian accent and today's (more American influenced?) "like", like?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#80956 - 09/18/02 03:38 AM
Re: like wait, there's more
|
newbie
Registered: 03/27/02
Posts: 45
Loc: perth, western australia
|
well, like while we're on the subject of, like new linguistic things. . .I am SO not happy with some of them. They like SO worth using - not!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#80957 - 09/18/02 05:17 AM
Re: "Like" earns linguistic validation
|
veteran
Registered: 10/11/00
Posts: 1346
Loc: Sussex, England
|
Is there a difference between Liverpudlian "like"..... and today's more (American influenced?) "like", like? Scousers I've known have always put the "like" at the end of the sentence, Jo, and I reckon its linguistic value would be even less than the (um) Californian version. But what do I know? We really need dody's opinion on this one, like. 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
8423 Members
16 Forums
13686 Topics
209748 Posts
Max Online: 3341 @ 12/09/11 02:15 PM
|
|
|
0 registered (),
37
Guests and
2
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|