Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
#60959 03/13/02 01:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,773
Pooh-Bah
OP Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,773
The Appellate Practice section of the Michigan State Bar has an EMail group, and a discussion arose which actually had some entertainment value. A little background: in recent years, certain Justices of the Michigan Supreme Court have subscribed to the textualist approach to the judicial interpretation of statutes; that is, they tend to decline any opportunity to construe statutory language in other than its strictest literal meaning, regardless of evidence of contrary legislative intent or of absurd results. This is yet another round in a very old tension between competing approaches to statutory interpretation, but one which led to the following exchange, which has at least the merit of humor:

Judge Learned Hand once observed: "[t]here is no surer way to misread any document than to read it literally." Guiseppi v. Walling, 144 F.2d 608, 624 (2nd Cir 1944), aff'd sub nom, Gemsco v. Walling, 324 U.S. 244 (1945). I wonder what our current Michigan Supreme Court would think of Judge Hand's remark.

It depends, Stu. Do you think they would read it literally?

Well did he "observe" or did he "write" it? Actually I suppose he might have handwritten it (but then again, he may have printed) or of course he could have dictated it then had it transcribed by another person, perhaps his secretary (in which case he would have "said" it). And when Judge Hand wrote (or printed or dictated or otherwise put forth) those words, did he mean "misread" or did he mean "read", because later he says (well, writes, or types or dictates)....

Ahhh ~ the rousing fun we have!


#60960 03/13/02 02:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
W
wwh Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Dear Sparteye: I always thought "Learned Hand" was a marvelous name for a highly regarded jurist, even after I found out his first name was pronounced "Larned". How about giving us some samples of the passages that could be interepreted in different ways?


#60961 03/13/02 03:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Judge Learned Hand once observed:

If you want to get literal, I, also, have observed the very same thing. Right there in your post, in green, I observed it. With my own eyes.


#60962 03/13/02 04:42 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 322
B
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
B
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 322
no wonder the wheels of justice turn so slowly


#60963 03/13/02 05:17 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Sparteye:

So being a textual deviate is important to a Michigan Supreme Court Justice?

TEd



TEd
#60964 03/13/02 05:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,773
Pooh-Bah
OP Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,773
So being a textual deviate is important to a Michigan Supreme Court Justice?

Almost. Not all of them are textual.



#60965 03/13/02 05:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,773
Pooh-Bah
OP Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,773
How about giving us some samples of the passages that could be interepreted in different ways?

Sure. It might take me a couple of days to put examples together, but I'll get to it.


Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
One of my favorites is:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary for the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."



TEd
#60967 03/13/02 07:06 PM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409
M
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
M
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
W
wwh Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary for the security of a free State, the right of the
people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

I can't see how the NRA gets the courts to go along with the idea that any asshole is entitled to have an assault rifle. In colonial days, the government did not supply weapons. The founding fathers meant to ensure availability of a "well regulated militia" not private survivalists.


Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,333
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 747 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,542
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5