|About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us|
You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith.org » Forums » General Topics » Q&A about words » vocabulary size Register User Forum List Calendar Active Topics Search FAQ
#2343 - 06/18/00 03:38 PM Re: vocabulary size
Loc: Auckland, New Zealand
It's an an old thread, but I came across this article and thought it would be of interest.
It's really a good site to explore. I've sent a query regarding public/private schools, but I notice that the Author is away until the end of July - we might have a long wait!
#2344 - 06/23/00 02:40 PM Re: vocabulary size
Loc: Northern CA
The Biggest question is how would someone measure someone's vocabulary. You can't just ask someone to List all the words they know. Thatís impractical and many words would be left off.
And another question is how do you define vocabulary? Is it words we understand? Because a large percentage of the time we understand the word only because of context and not the word its self.
#2345 - 06/23/00 03:03 PM Re: vocabulary size
Loc: Vienna, Austria
Regarding the controversy about what to include in an estimation of a person's vocabulary: estimates of the size of Shakespeare's vocabulary range from 15,000 to 30,000 words, depending on what you decide to count. Here the question of counting method is crucial, since the scholars working in this area base their estimates on the same body of texts. The one who arrived at the highest word count regards the different forms of a word (such as cry, cries, cried, criedst) as separate words. He also includes proper names in his estimate. This does not address your question directly, I know, but indicates another kind of problem encountered when estimating vocabulary: what is a word? Regarding the question whether passive vocabulary should be included in such a count, I would say yes, since most of us use only a small part of our vocabulary actively and otherwise the numbers we would be looking at as estimates would hardly serve to satisfy our vanity. Isn't that what this question is all about, anyway?
#2346 - 06/23/00 08:27 PM Re: vocabulary size
Loc: Northern CA
So maybe a better way to count someone's [someplace] used vocabulary would to strap a tape recorder to them and
record a few days worth of usage. Then enter all the words they used and have a computer count them and
remove redundancies. Do this 5-6 times and I bet you would have a very good idea as to how big
someone's used vocabulary would be.
#2347 - 06/24/00 12:38 AM Re: vocabulary size
But you would still have the problem of what counts as a word (do inflections and compounds count?) and would still only get the most commonly used part of their spoken active vocabulary. For example, I certainly know the word "fraternisation" but have only used it once or twice in my life.
#2348 - 06/24/00 11:54 AM Re: vocabulary size
Loc: Louisville, Kentucky
Here's another spanner in the works:
in counting someone's vocabulary, how many languages
do you allow ? Do you allow extremely well-known
words (e.g., pro bono, c'est la vie) from another language?
And what if the person speaks several languages?
#2349 - 06/26/00 03:36 AM Re: vocabulary size
It seems to me that most contributors to this thread assume at least implicitly that vocabulary size stands for a certain quality of a person: the larger the better.. This is certainly valid up to a point. Rather than speculating about the maximum possible vocabulary size, it would be interesting to know the "most useful" size, i.e. the point where further increase only appeals to collectors of rarities, and does not contribute anymore to the precision of communication. Accessibility of information quite generally decreases with growing volume.
#2350 - 06/26/00 07:43 AM Re: vocabulary size
Loc: Louisville, Kentucky
Excellent, wsieber! The whole point of using words is to
communicate, and it is interesting to speculate on what
you're communicating if no one knows what you're saying.
One difficulty, though: who gets to decide at what point
>>"where further increase only appeals to collectors of rarities, and does not contribute anymore to the precision of communication."<<
As an example, I use in my normal speech words that many of
my church friends don't seem to know, but my Mensa friends do. And Tsuwm and our old friend Jeff, at least, are clearly light-years ahead of me in the vocabulary dep't.
Response eagerly anticipated!
#2351 - 06/26/00 03:36 PM Re: vocabulary size
>Accessibility of information quite generally decreases with growing volume.
I find age a big factor, my recall is not what it once was. Perhaps it is because my brain is so full of useless information, for example where to buy the cheapest petrol (gas) in a place I no longer live. I know so many road names of places I may never visit again (one of the problems of moving house so much) I just wish I could archive some of the useless stuff and make room for some more information.
#2352 - 06/27/00 12:42 AM Re: vocabulary size
>and it is interesting to speculate on what
you're communicating if no one knows what you're saying.<
Sorry to repeat myself, I have been harping on that before, in connection with Latin etc. In the case you mention, I am communicating: "Look what an intelligent and learned person I am and how lucky you are to know me" .
Forum Stats 8768 Members
Max Online: 3341 @ 12/09/11 02:15 PM
Newest Members DeathCake, malagachica, Jamie, pr3sedentedonut, sleeper54
8768 Registered Users
Who's Online 0 registered (), 33 Guests and 4 Spiders online. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters (30 Days)
endymion6 109 LukeJavan8 106 wofahulicodoc 97 AlimaeHP 14 Tromboniator 10 BranShea 2 tsuwm 2 sleeper54 1 wsieber 1 Storymom 1
wwh 13858 Faldage 13803 Jackie 11610 tsuwm 10525 Buffalo Shrdlu 7210 LukeJavan8 6781 AnnaStrophic 6511 Wordwind 6296 of troy 5400 BranShea 5284
Board Rules · Mark all read Contact Us · Wordsmith.org · Top
Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat
© 2014 Wordsmith