No hollow phrases - Wordsmith.org

You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith.org » Forums » General Topics » Miscellany » No hollow phrases

Page 4 of 6

Topic Options

#206106 - 06/19/12 04:42 PM Re: the risk of un-meaning [Re: Faldage]
BranShea Carpal Tunnel Registered: 06/23/06 Posts: 5249 Loc: Netherlands, the Hague	Question: Are you saying you find Shakespeare readable or Neal Stephenson readable? Shakespeare. As the 'he' in your question clearly refers to Shakespeare, not to Neal Stephenson. Question:Do you suppose he would find it readable? I think he would find it (Neal Stephenson) readable, (with a large amount of annotations).
Top

#206112 - 06/20/12 03:36 AM Re: the risk of un-meaning [Re: Faldage]
BranShea Carpal Tunnel Registered: 06/23/06 Posts: 5249 Loc: Netherlands, the Hague	Anyway dear Faldage, my concern is not whether our languages will still be readable in 500 years. My concern is how to keep them readable today!
Top

#206116 - 06/20/12 06:37 AM Re: the risk of un-meaning [Re: BranShea]
zmjezhd Carpal Tunnel Registered: 08/13/05 Posts: 3269 Loc: R'lyeh	My concern is how to keep them readable today! The syntax of English has not changed too dramatically between Shakespeare's and Stephenson's times. The vocabulary and the meanings of many lexical items more so. I'd say the biggest changes have been in the cultural and knowledge areas. So while I can imagine that Shakespeare might, with some ramp-up time, be able to "read" Snow Crash, he probably wouldn't understand a lot of it. The same holds for Stephenson reading Shakespeare (or a lesser known Elizabethan-Jacobean writer) without modern editions and critical apparatus. _________________________ Ceci n'est pas un seing.
Top

#206117 - 06/20/12 06:53 AM Re: the risk of un-meaning [Re: BranShea]
Faldage Carpal Tunnel Registered: 12/01/00 Posts: 13657	Originally Posted By: BranShea Anyway dear Faldage, my concern is not whether our languages will still be readable in 500 years. My concern is how to keep them readable today! I think much of the concern about the state of the language these days is due to the explosion of unedited writing seen on the web. Unfortunately this unedited writing is moving into the print media with the layoffs of copy-editors at newspapers but that's another problem.
Top

#206118 - 06/20/12 09:28 AM Re: the risk of un-meaning [Re: BranShea]
gooofy newbie Registered: 01/19/12 Posts: 37	Originally Posted By: BranShea Anyway dear Faldage, my concern is not whether our languages will still be readable in 500 years. My concern is how to keep them readable today! But where is the evidence that unedited English, bad grammar, or whatever is leading to huge breakdowns in communication?
Top

#206119 - 06/20/12 10:05 AM Re: the migration of tongues [Re: gooofy]
zmjezhd Carpal Tunnel Registered: 08/13/05 Posts: 3269 Loc: R'lyeh	But where is the evidence that unedited English, bad grammar, or whatever is leading to huge breakdowns in communication? Exactly! When languages change, it is because the speakers/writers are speaking/writing differently. Once a language changes enough, another language emerges. Latin changed greatly between Plautus' time and Ausonius'. Then it changed even more, until Latin became Italian, French, Spanish, etc. Is French a degenerate form of Latin? Or an improvement? Neither. It is merely a different language. About the breakdown in communication, I have always wondered how a peever can correct somebody else's grammar. Shouldn't they just be uncomprehending? If you can understand me to give your "correct" version of what I just said/wrote, then you understood me and there is no need for "correction". [Corrected the typo that tsuwm pointed out.] Edited by zmjezhd (06/20/12 06:18 PM) _________________________ Ceci n'est pas un seing.
Top

#206125 - 06/20/12 02:01 PM Re: the migration of tongues [Re: zmjezhd]
tsuwm Carpal Tunnel Registered: 04/03/00 Posts: 10464 Loc: this too shall pass	here's a llittle bit of that there evidence.
Top

#206128 - 06/20/12 02:39 PM Re: the migration of tongues [Re: BranShea]
tsuwm Carpal Tunnel Registered: 04/03/00 Posts: 10464 Loc: this too shall pass	a decriptivist might surmise that he meant "Latin became" here.
Top

#206129 - 06/20/12 02:40 PM Re: the risk of un-meaning [Re: zmjezhd]
BranShea Carpal Tunnel Registered: 06/23/06 Posts: 5249 Loc: Netherlands, the Hague	Originally Posted By: zmjezhd My concern is how to keep them readable today! The syntax of English has not changed too dramatically between Shakespeare's and Stephenson's times. The vocabulary and the meanings of many lexical items more so. I'd say the biggest changes have been in the cultural and knowledge areas. So while I can imagine that Shakespeare might, with some ramp-up time, be able to "read" Snow Crash,, he probably wouldn't understand a lot of it. The same holds for Stephenson reading Shakespeare (or a lesser known Elizabethan-Jacobean writer) without modern editions and critical apparatus. Yes, it would have to be (very roughly) one quarter book and three quarter footnotes.
Top

#206130 - 06/20/12 02:54 PM Re: the migration of tongues [Re: tsuwm]
BranShea Carpal Tunnel Registered: 06/23/06 Posts: 5249 Loc: Netherlands, the Hague	Originally Posted By: tsuwm a decriptivist might surmise that he meant "Latin became" here. Thanks. I did't mean to be a prescriptivist. Just did could not fill that in. Edited by BranShea (06/21/12 04:58 AM)
Top

Page 4 of 6

Moderator: Jackie

Forum Stats

8426 Members
16 Forums
13687 Topics
209797 Posts

Max Online: 3341 @ 12/09/11 02:15 PM

Newest Members


	Wordsmith Talk		About Us \| What's New \| Search \| Site Map \| Contact Us

Wordsmith Talk