|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 724
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 724 |
Do you think communicating through thoughts is the communication of the future? Is it a bit one sided though? Only one person can hear the other? Can all people communicate mentally or some?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 956
old hand
|
|
old hand
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 956 |
I guess I don't see how that differs from what I said.
Sorry bro! I read your statement:
Synchronicity has the flavor of cause and effect at a distance that's missing from coincidence.
As being opposed to:
There is an acausal principle that links events having a similar meaning by their coincidence in time.
But now I see where your comparison comes from.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 655
addict
|
|
addict
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 655 |
@ Olly: And in looking at it again, I don't think I had it quite right. I'm going to have to dust off and re-read Jung to see how (his translators) express it.
@ Avy: Robt. Heinlein addressed this in one of his novels, where he proposes that the only practical form of communication between distant vessels and Earth would be some form of mental communication, which (again, he proposes) is instantaneous over any distance.
"I don't know which is worse: ignorance or apathy. And, frankly, I don't care." - Anonymous
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 724
old hand
|
|
old hand
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 724 |
@ Olly:
the only practical form of communication between distant vessels and Earth would be some form of mental communication, which (again, he proposes) is instantaneous over any distance. ... which brings to mind the question whether one thinks in a language or in electric impulses. If language, then my thoughts in Tamil would not be understood by the Gorgonzolas who think in Gorgozolian.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 |
... which brings to mind the question whether one thinks in a language or in electric impulses. If language, then my thoughts in Tamil would not be understood by the Gorgonzolas who think in Gorgozolian. Just my own unsupported thoughts on the matter: I think we think in electric impulses over which we lay our understanding of reality as represented by our language. I guess this means in the Tamil/Gorgonzolian example (or any translingual example) that the communication could be very easily misunderstood completely.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,919 Likes: 3
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,919 Likes: 3 |
In this whole discussion I keep thinking about the movie
"Close Encounters of the Third Kind", musical notes.
----please, draw me a sheep----
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554
veteran
|
|
veteran
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554 |
What? Are there those who still think that "thoughts" are not physical? How can they (meaning "thoughts") be otherwise?
Last edited by jenny jenny; 08/26/10 09:58 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526
veteran
|
|
veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526 |
Cognitive bias.
Last edited by TheFallibleFiend; 08/26/10 10:01 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 655
addict
|
|
addict
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 655 |
This is more philosophical than biological. Imagine a modern astronomer sitting on a hillside watching the sun come up. Next to him sits a 7th-Century stargazer. Do they see the same thing? (Not my question, but I've long forgotten where I read it. And, curiously, "watching the sun come up" reflects what the medieval guy would see, not the modern astronomer.)
The physical things that are happening in their visual pathways are the same, but I don't believe they see the same thing. We see what we know. Likewise, I believe, we "think" what we know.
"I don't know which is worse: ignorance or apathy. And, frankly, I don't care." - Anonymous
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 655
addict
|
|
addict
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 655 |
@jj: Thoughts may not be physical in the same way that heat is not physical. Heat occurs in the physical world, but it is our perception of the underlying movement of molecules or infrared photons that is what the average person means by "heat." Just like "purple" or "happy," we are not able really to know how another person perceives "heat."
"I don't know which is worse: ignorance or apathy. And, frankly, I don't care." - Anonymous
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,363
Members9,182
| |
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
|
0 members (),
529
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
